Talk:LLC,,.
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Necessary?) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Necessary?: yes) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Well, it is a running gag, and there's three appearances. When there was just two, we could just say Totalsoft was a reference to Thoraxcorp, but with three, it's a running joke in its own right. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 22:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | :Well, it is a running gag, and there's three appearances. When there was just two, we could just say Totalsoft was a reference to Thoraxcorp, but with three, it's a running joke in its own right. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 22:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --[[User:Jay|<span style = "color: #9999FF">''JJC''</span>]][[User talk:Jay|<span style = "color: #006633"><small>,,.</small></span>]] 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | ::Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --[[User:Jay|<span style = "color: #9999FF">''JJC''</span>]][[User talk:Jay|<span style = "color: #006633"><small>,,.</small></span>]] 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Certainly valid. '''Keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:17, 31 March 2009
Necessary?
What the crap-make? What is this? WHY is this? Why did you even add this garglemesh? I don't understand! Or maybe I sort of do... but do we need this? --Jellote 19:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it is a running gag, and there's three appearances. When there was just two, we could just say Totalsoft was a reference to Thoraxcorp, but with three, it's a running joke in its own right. --phlip TC 22:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --JJC,,. 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly valid. Keep — Defender1031*Talk 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --JJC,,. 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)