Talk:Nonexistent Strong Bad Emails

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Needed?: i'm surprised to even see this up for discussion)
(→Needed?)
Line 5: Line 5:
::I think this is a rather interesting concept. Strong Bad *has* mentioned, and even shown flashbacks to, numerous "e-mails" that don't actually exist. It needs a cleanup, but I see no reason why this page should be deleted... '''Keep'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 00:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
::I think this is a rather interesting concept. Strong Bad *has* mentioned, and even shown flashbacks to, numerous "e-mails" that don't actually exist. It needs a cleanup, but I see no reason why this page should be deleted... '''Keep'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 00:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
:::Certainly a valid article. Keep. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
:::Certainly a valid article. Keep. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::Agreeing with YK.  '''Keep''' it. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:30, 11 March 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Needed?

There haven't been enough references to make this a good page, and the references on the page aren't even relevant. Delete. — MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 23:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean by both references being "relevant". Both of the examples given fit the page's description, and there is at least a third that I'm aware of (and personal favorites can be greatly expanded.) I think it's deserving of a clean-up, a merge if not a keep, and certainly not a delete. --Jay (Gobble) 23:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I think this is a rather interesting concept. Strong Bad *has* mentioned, and even shown flashbacks to, numerous "e-mails" that don't actually exist. It needs a cleanup, but I see no reason why this page should be deleted... Keep. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 00:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Certainly a valid article. Keep. — Defender1031*Talk 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreeing with YK. Keep it. —Guard Duck talk 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Nonexistent_Strong_Bad_Emails"
Personal tools