Talk:Get Outta My X

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Unusual?: reply)
(→Unusual?: my lengthy comment)
Line 9: Line 9:
::::::That's for mundane objects.  As one who has complained about that very page, you should see the difference, here.  -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 01:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
::::::That's for mundane objects.  As one who has complained about that very page, you should see the difference, here.  -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 01:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I think that anything that's used in a mundane way doesn't deserve its own page. I don't think that rule is specifically limited to objects. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I think that anything that's used in a mundane way doesn't deserve its own page. I don't think that rule is specifically limited to objects. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::::::If it were my personal decision as supreme overlord of the wiki, I would keep this article solely to keep the reference to the instance in Date Nite. That moment is just that cool.
 +
::::::::From a more objective, following-the-wiki-guidelines-type perspective, though, I can't support this article. The use of the phrase is just too mundane and ordinary. It's not a catch phrase like "seriously" or "holy crap". It's not used in unusual contexts, except maybe in Date Nite (even there, the phrase itself is used in an ordinary way; it's just that the normal laws of physics seem suddenly not to apply to Marzi and Strong Bad, causing a moment of utmost humour). I put absolutely '''zero''' stock in the spoons page as anything more than an essay, but still, when making articles about words and phrases, I think there ought to be something to make the phrase stand out. I don't see that here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:39, 26 February 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Unusual?

It seems to me that this common phrase has never been used in an unusual way. This seems like an example of a mundane thing that occurs because it fits where it happens. — Defender1031*Talk 23:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Looks like another "Awesome" article to me. Delete BBG 23:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
It's used more consistently than awesome. I think it's valid. -132.183.138.34 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
It's used consistently in decidedly ordinary places, where one would expect it to be used. — Defender1031*Talk 01:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
There's no rule that we can't document ordinary things. A manner of speech that Strong Bad repeatedly uses is notable imo. -132.183.138.34 01:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes there is. — Defender1031*Talk 01:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
That's for mundane objects. As one who has complained about that very page, you should see the difference, here. -132.183.138.34 01:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I think that anything that's used in a mundane way doesn't deserve its own page. I don't think that rule is specifically limited to objects. — Defender1031*Talk 01:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
If it were my personal decision as supreme overlord of the wiki, I would keep this article solely to keep the reference to the instance in Date Nite. That moment is just that cool.
From a more objective, following-the-wiki-guidelines-type perspective, though, I can't support this article. The use of the phrase is just too mundane and ordinary. It's not a catch phrase like "seriously" or "holy crap". It's not used in unusual contexts, except maybe in Date Nite (even there, the phrase itself is used in an ordinary way; it's just that the normal laws of physics seem suddenly not to apply to Marzi and Strong Bad, causing a moment of utmost humour). I put absolutely zero stock in the spoons page as anything more than an essay, but still, when making articles about words and phrases, I think there ought to be something to make the phrase stand out. I don't see that here. Heimstern Läufer 01:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Get_Outta_My_X"
Personal tools