Talk:The

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Delete: redirect)
(NOVEMBER FOOL!)
Line 10: Line 10:
::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
::::::::Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalant to this article, I propose an immediate '''redirect'''. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:15, 4 November 2008


The Delete

The? An article on "The"? Oh, just delete it. This is such a spoon type article. wbwolf (t | ed) 04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

You know, i think this article illustrates the point better than the word spoons. i move for rewriting the spoons article to be on the word "the" instead... (And yes, delete VERY VERY hard). ;) — Defender1031*Talk 04:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I think redirecting it to Integral Article might also be a good notion. --DorianGray 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. — Defender1031*Talk 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've *been* making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually *do* that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone *did* make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, redirect to Integral Article. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Was this article a joke??! A redirect to Integral Article would be the soft option; I'm for deleting it outright. --Jay (Gobble) 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. Heimstern Läufer 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect. Loafing 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalant to this article, I propose an immediate redirect. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! – The Chort 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)