Talk:The
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→The Delete) |
(→The Delete: redirect is fine) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've *been* making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually *do* that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone *did* make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC) | ::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've *been* making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually *do* that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone *did* make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC) | :::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:40, 3 November 2008
The Delete
The? An article on "The"? Oh, just delete it. This is such a spoon type article. wbwolf (t | ed) 04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- You know, i think this article illustrates the point better than the word spoons. i move for rewriting the spoons article to be on the word "the" instead... (And yes, delete VERY VERY hard). ;) — Defender1031*Talk 04:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think redirecting it to Integral Article might also be a good notion. --DorianGray 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. — Defender1031*Talk 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- ...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've *been* making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually *do* that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone *did* make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, redirect to Integral Article. -YK
04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Was this article a joke??! A redirect to Integral Article would be the soft option; I'm for deleting it outright. --Jay (Gobble) 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. Heimstern Läufer
07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. Heimstern Läufer
- Was this article a joke??! A redirect to Integral Article would be the soft option; I'm for deleting it outright. --Jay (Gobble) 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- ...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've *been* making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually *do* that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone *did* make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, redirect to Integral Article. -YK
- I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. — Defender1031*Talk 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think redirecting it to Integral Article might also be a good notion. --DorianGray 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)