Talk:The Only Girl

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
::I've never made a page before, so I didn't think it might be that good. I said on the [[Girls]] page that I didn't care if someone deleted it. But let me see if i can find more examples so I can improve it. [[User:Homestar-winner|Homestar-winner]] 13:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
::I've never made a page before, so I didn't think it might be that good. I said on the [[Girls]] page that I didn't care if someone deleted it. But let me see if i can find more examples so I can improve it. [[User:Homestar-winner|Homestar-winner]] 13:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
:::Note, now that the page has been moved and fixed up a little, it ''just might'' describe a useful concept within the body of work. I'm remaining '''neutral''' for now. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 14:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
:::Note, now that the page has been moved and fixed up a little, it ''just might'' describe a useful concept within the body of work. I'm remaining '''neutral''' for now. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 14:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
-
::::I can't find any more examples. Does anyone see anymore?I don't want this to be deleted because this was the first page that i made. But that isn't a good enough reason to not deleted. [[User:Homestar-winner|Homestar-winner]] 15:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
+
::::I can't find any more examples. Does anyone see anymore?As for deleting it, I don't want this to be deleted because this was the first page that i made. But that isn't a good enough reason to not deleted. [[User:Homestar-winner|Homestar-winner]] 15:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
== The one and only ==
== The one and only ==

Revision as of 15:25, 30 March 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 


I really think we're scraping the bottom of the barrel with a lot of these new articles. Even if I thought we needed a page for this concept, "Absence of Females" is such an awkward title. "The Only Girl" would be better (which I will now move this page to). — It's dot com 13:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but someone suggested it and i had no better idea. Do you have any more examples? I'll look around for more. Homestar-winner 13:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I've never made a page before, so I didn't think it might be that good. I said on the Girls page that I didn't care if someone deleted it. But let me see if i can find more examples so I can improve it. Homestar-winner 13:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Note, now that the page has been moved and fixed up a little, it just might describe a useful concept within the body of work. I'm remaining neutral for now. — It's dot com 14:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I can't find any more examples. Does anyone see anymore?As for deleting it, I don't want this to be deleted because this was the first page that i made. But that isn't a good enough reason to not deleted. Homestar-winner 15:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The one and only

Have there been DVD transcripts where TBC mention and/or explain the 1-girl phenomenon. Although we get all these small articles, there is some level of interest in discussing this, even if it's just another Smurfette effect. --Stux 14:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm assuming you mean besides Why Come Only One Girl?, right? — It's dot com 14:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:The_Only_Girl"
Personal tools