Talk:Scroll Button Songs (video)
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(explanation) |
m (→Revert: +link) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Revert == | == Revert == | ||
| - | Oh, originally my revert was for the {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | + | Oh, originally my {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:40, 28 March 2007
Revert
Oh, originally my revert was for the merge template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --Stux 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
