Talk:Lotionman

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(just an item)
Line 2: Line 2:
So, is he a pseudocharacter? he's given a name and everything. If even [[Carol]], who's only been "spoken to" to imply pseudocharacterness, then I think Lotionman should ge gives pseudocharacter status. I won't shed any tears if he's just an item, though. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 02:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
So, is he a pseudocharacter? he's given a name and everything. If even [[Carol]], who's only been "spoken to" to imply pseudocharacterness, then I think Lotionman should ge gives pseudocharacter status. I won't shed any tears if he's just an item, though. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 02:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 +
:Carol is spoken to as though "she" can hear and understand Marzipan, and she even responds with a scale at one point. The Denzel at least has a face, although I could see an argument for it not being considered a pseudocharacter. This, however, is a cap. The email says they gave ''it'' a name, but that's it. At no point does it look, act, or speak like a character, and at no point do we see anyone treating it as such. It is therefore just an item. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 02:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:43, 3 March 2007

Pseudocharacter?

So, is he a pseudocharacter? he's given a name and everything. If even Carol, who's only been "spoken to" to imply pseudocharacterness, then I think Lotionman should ge gives pseudocharacter status. I won't shed any tears if he's just an item, though. Dr. Clash 02:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Carol is spoken to as though "she" can hear and understand Marzipan, and she even responds with a scale at one point. The Denzel at least has a face, although I could see an argument for it not being considered a pseudocharacter. This, however, is a cap. The email says they gave it a name, but that's it. At no point does it look, act, or speak like a character, and at no point do we see anyone treating it as such. It is therefore just an item. — It's dot com 02:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)