Talk:Cats

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 22:55, 16 June 2006

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

Tigers aren't considered cats are they? Maggot Man (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

They are classified under the cat family. So yes.--H*Bad 22:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

10 pts. for the ref. Anydangway, for the reasons listed on Talk:Frogs, I think this should go. --Jay (Gobble) 22:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

This one accually shows 3 cats. Now some of the appearences can go, like 'sitten with a kitten'.--H*Bad 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, three cats appear, but cats are common animals and the references really aren't all that notable. --Jay (Gobble) 22:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Example: the article Paint is also common, yet it was allowed to stay.--H*Bad 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Those are related, though: the cans are all the same style and have the same font on them. --Jay (Gobble) 22:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ::Yes, three cats appear, but cats are common animals and the references really aren't all that notable. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 :::Example: the article [[Paint]] is also common, yet it was allowed to stay.--[[User:H*Bad|H*Bad]] 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
+::::Those are related, though: the cans are all the same style and have the same font on them. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)