Talk:Karen Wagner
From Homestar Runner Wiki
BazookaJoe (Talk | contribs) |
AbdiViklas (Talk | contribs) (privacy and the Rights of Stubs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Which ones were you thinking of? -[[User:AtionSong|<font face="BankGothic Md BT">AtionSong</font>]] 19:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | :Which ones were you thinking of? -[[User:AtionSong|<font face="BankGothic Md BT">AtionSong</font>]] 19:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
::No more "Minor such-and-such" pages, please. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 19:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | ::No more "Minor such-and-such" pages, please. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 19:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | No insult to the idea, but for one thing I don't like the value implied by "minor" family member (just because they don't make a flash cartoon). And secondly, I'd just like to remind us that TBC seem to be reluctant to provide public insight into their extended family, and I'd like to respect that. Any form of research that goes beyond stray comments they might make in interviews would be distasteful to me. (This page doesn't do that, of course, but I just wanted to head off any kind of "family members" project at the pass.) Now, ALL that said, there's nothing wrong with short pages when there isn't much info to know. People have questioned the legitimacy of such people-pages before, as in [[Talk:Ryan Bradley]]; see Tom's comments there. —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 19:19, 31 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:19, 31 December 2005
This page, along with some others, are pretty unneccesary. Anyone think I should make a "minor Chapman family members" page? I think it'll be a lot more useful than having many very minor pages. ♥ teeeffoh! 18:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Which ones were you thinking of? -AtionSong 19:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- No more "Minor such-and-such" pages, please. —BazookaJoe 19:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
No insult to the idea, but for one thing I don't like the value implied by "minor" family member (just because they don't make a flash cartoon). And secondly, I'd just like to remind us that TBC seem to be reluctant to provide public insight into their extended family, and I'd like to respect that. Any form of research that goes beyond stray comments they might make in interviews would be distasteful to me. (This page doesn't do that, of course, but I just wanted to head off any kind of "family members" project at the pass.) Now, ALL that said, there's nothing wrong with short pages when there isn't much info to know. People have questioned the legitimacy of such people-pages before, as in Talk:Ryan Bradley; see Tom's comments there. —AbdiViklas 19:19, 31 December 2005 (UTC)