HRWiki talk:Personal images

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fourth category: reply)
(Fourth category: reply)
Line 7: Line 7:
:I'm not sure. If its so wildly popular, wouldn't it probably be in an article somewhere? — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 23:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
:I'm not sure. If its so wildly popular, wouldn't it probably be in an article somewhere? — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 23:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
::I'm thinking of things like this (which are shown full-size): [[Image:Hsrlogo_small.jpg]] [[Image:The-cheat-small.png]] I'm not even sure this is a good idea, but the idea popped in my brain and so I thought I'd at least bring it up here. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:11, 27 December 2005

Multiple users using an image

To me it seems that images should only be attributed to one person at a time. This was made clear when Joey's image was temporarily attributed to more than one person. I don't see how that could be anyone's image but his, and anyone else who puts it on a page is merely using it. By the same token, several users can get together and loan each other images. (If this becomes a problem then we can figure out what to do then, but it isn't like users aren't already putting gobs of pictures on their pages; they're just using ones that are already in use.) — It's dot com 23:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Fourth category

Should we make a category for images that are so general it's likely a lot of users might want to use them? These would be considered owned by the wiki and thus wouldn't count against anyone's total number of images. I'm talking specifically about things like H*R Wiki logos and whatnot. It would be simple enough for someone to say on an image's talk page: "I think the wiki should claim this one," and if there's a consensus, then it gets put in a different category. What do you think? — It's dot com 23:52, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure. If its so wildly popular, wouldn't it probably be in an article somewhere? — Lapper (talk) 23:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm thinking of things like this (which are shown full-size): Image:Hsrlogo_small.jpg Image:The-cheat-small.png I'm not even sure this is a good idea, but the idea popped in my brain and so I thought I'd at least bring it up here. — It's dot com 00:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)