Editing Talk:Captain's Hat

{{tbd|talk}}
== A hat ==
Umm...it's a hat. Why do we need this? --[[User:Technochocolate|Technochocolate]] 06:55, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:I think it is kinda pointless, but after all, there is pretty much unlimited space on the wiki, so i think we might as well keep it. I dunno. It seems cool.--[[User:Bubsty|'''''Bubsty''''']]
::There isn't unlimited space. Remember all those 509s? [[User:Choco|Choco]] 14:18, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
:::Sorry, I said that when I was stupid. {{User:Bubsty/sig}} 05:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

== Skip ==
The captain's hat looks like a white version of Skipper's from Gilligan's island.[[User:Elvis|Elvis]] 01:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

== Bowler ==
Sorry to bring this up again, but I think if [[Homsar's Bowler Hat]] doesn't get an article, then (or than, IDK) this article should not be. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 18:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

== Third time's a charm ==
To bring this up once again, doesn't this article technically not follow inclusion guidelines? It's only appeared twice and I thought items typically needed to be included at least three times and/or be used in an odd fashion. And since he just wears it and nothing is really all that special about it, I say '''delete'''. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 15:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
:That rule is for running gags. An item can have a page if it's just there. So, considering we have a page for the [[Wetski]], [[The Strongs' Capsela]], and [[BUBRUB!]], this page deserves to be '''kept'''. I mean, read the [[Items]] page and look at how many obscure items there are listed! {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 16:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
::Agree, keep. -[[Special:Contributions/209.6.137.13|209.6.137.13]] 13:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

==Let's Review==

1. Running gag? Nope, just two examples.

2. Generic item/event? Nope, not five examples.

3. <b>H*R-specific item? This one is the key, I think. Only needs one appearance, but important. Is this important? It's mentioned specifically, but this one is up for debate. Then it says any item that is <i>part of an outfit</i> does not merit a page. With all that, I say no.</b>

4. Relating to a character? Not relating to a different variation of Strong Bad, so no.

5. Other page? This could theoretically be a yes, as it's not in the main page, though the Captain Strong Bad character is.

6. Inclusion? Certainly could be included elsewhere.

7. Inappropriate? No.

In total, I vote to abolish the page, though I did enjoy reading it. {{user-anon}}