Talk:Punkin Show
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (remove useless chatty posts) |
(→Could I?: Imperative tense) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::::::1:Yeah you can't hold off on something, or it's gonna get claimèd. Plus sign, you don't need to do your homework now. We get off tomorrow for Veteran's Day. 2: They do get too claimed fast. That's prolly because there's prolly like *estimated guess*100 peopleses trying to go for it at once. But it takes longer to do transcripts then it does to claim them. Weird...ed out. {{User:Crab Attack1999/sig}} 01:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ::::::::1:Yeah you can't hold off on something, or it's gonna get claimèd. Plus sign, you don't need to do your homework now. We get off tomorrow for Veteran's Day. 2: They do get too claimed fast. That's prolly because there's prolly like *estimated guess*100 peopleses trying to go for it at once. But it takes longer to do transcripts then it does to claim them. Weird...ed out. {{User:Crab Attack1999/sig}} 01:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::That Game Dude, how much more clear can we make "15-30 minutes"? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | :::::::::That Game Dude, how much more clear can we make "15-30 minutes"? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::::::No, what I mean is a way for people to realise when a pageinprogress is invalidated. It can be very frustrating to have to check page history, count 15 minutes, take down the pip, then cause an edit conflict because the guy wasn't ''regularly'' saving, and he's mad because 30 minutes haven't passed. Perhaps saying "save after 20 minutes" instead of "try to save every 15-30 minutes" would help? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 02:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
== ????! == | == ????! == | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 11 November 2009
Could I?
Is this where I request to do the transcript? Toonypie
- I beleive it is. Crab
Attack1999
22:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- You can't "request" a transcript. You just have to be lucky and do it before anyone else gets to it. If no one else has gotten to it, just plunk {{transcriptinprogress}} down on the appropriate section, and get to work. And keep working, or you'll lose your right to it. --DorianGray 22:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay fine, i'm new at this. You don't have bite my head off (Get on on my case about it, if you don't know the expression). CrabAttack1999 22:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Also, Who's working on the transcript anyway? I know it isn't me. CrabAttack1999
- Nobody edit please :D Doing some homework then finishing.
- Huh? What in the— You can't do that!... can he? That Game Dude 386
00:28, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Homework is a good call, but no dibs. Never fear, Toonypie, there'll be more transcripts in the future. JamesLucas (" " or +) 00:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Dang, these transcripts get claimed fast... almost too fast, it seems. I think we need to make the guidelines a bit more clear for the pageinprogress template (namely when a person loses their claim to a transcript) to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. Maybe a more clearly defined time limit? That Game Dude 386 00:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- 1:Yeah you can't hold off on something, or it's gonna get claimèd. Plus sign, you don't need to do your homework now. We get off tomorrow for Veteran's Day. 2: They do get too claimed fast. That's prolly because there's prolly like *estimated guess*100 peopleses trying to go for it at once. But it takes longer to do transcripts then it does to claim them. Weird...ed out. CrabAttack1999 01:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- That Game Dude, how much more clear can we make "15-30 minutes"? — Defender1031*Talk 02:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- No, what I mean is a way for people to realise when a pageinprogress is invalidated. It can be very frustrating to have to check page history, count 15 minutes, take down the pip, then cause an edit conflict because the guy wasn't regularly saving, and he's mad because 30 minutes haven't passed. Perhaps saying "save after 20 minutes" instead of "try to save every 15-30 minutes" would help? That Game Dude 386 02:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- No, what I mean is a way for people to realise when a pageinprogress is invalidated. It can be very frustrating to have to check page history, count 15 minutes, take down the pip, then cause an edit conflict because the guy wasn't regularly saving, and he's mad because 30 minutes haven't passed. Perhaps saying "save after 20 minutes" instead of "try to save every 15-30 minutes" would help? That Game Dude 386
- That Game Dude, how much more clear can we make "15-30 minutes"? — Defender1031*Talk 02:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- 1:Yeah you can't hold off on something, or it's gonna get claimèd. Plus sign, you don't need to do your homework now. We get off tomorrow for Veteran's Day. 2: They do get too claimed fast. That's prolly because there's prolly like *estimated guess*100 peopleses trying to go for it at once. But it takes longer to do transcripts then it does to claim them. Weird...ed out. Crab
- Dang, these transcripts get claimed fast... almost too fast, it seems. I think we need to make the guidelines a bit more clear for the pageinprogress template (namely when a person loses their claim to a transcript) to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. Maybe a more clearly defined time limit? That Game Dude 386
- Agreed. Homework is a good call, but no dibs. Never fear, Toonypie, there'll be more transcripts in the future. JamesLucas (" " or +) 00:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Also, Who's working on the transcript anyway? I know it isn't me. Crab
- Okay fine, i'm new at this. You don't have bite my head off (Get on on my case about it, if you don't know the expression). Crab
- You can't "request" a transcript. You just have to be lucky and do it before anyone else gets to it. If no one else has gotten to it, just plunk {{transcriptinprogress}} down on the appropriate section, and get to work. And keep working, or you'll lose your right to it. --DorianGray 22:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
????!
For the ????! I think he said laditlemen. This is another one of those, uh what's it called? Portmanteau, that's it. It's another portmanteau, because laditlemen is a combanation of "Ladies" and "Gentlemen", but i'm not exact on what he said. But it did sound like he said laditlemen. And if it is, i'd be happy to add it to the portmanteaus page. Crab
Once a-craping-gain, nevermind that. But if noone added it to the page, i'll do it. Crab
Attack1999
23:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Attack1999 23:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- SUCCESS! Nobody beat me to adding it to portnateaus. So gentlemadies and ladentlemen, none of you have to worry 'bout that. CrabAttack1999 23:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
