Talk:BMW Lighter
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
AbdiViklas (Talk | contribs) (→Image Overuse?: oh my yes.) |
m (→Image Overuse?: Gallery maybe?) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Are all these images really nessecary? Why not something like [[Duct Tape|this]] or [[Ducks|this]]? I think that the debut and CGI images are enough for this page. - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 00:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | Are all these images really nessecary? Why not something like [[Duct Tape|this]] or [[Ducks|this]]? I think that the debut and CGI images are enough for this page. - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 00:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
:Oh, my goodness, seconded! That's a long freakin' page for a 2"-square object! —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 01:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | :Oh, my goodness, seconded! That's a long freakin' page for a 2"-square object! —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 01:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The article is like this because back when it was started, there were only three appearances. I don't have a problem with the images. If you don't like the layout, we could probably but them in a nice gallery.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 01:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:53, 28 November 2005
Real Lighter
I found a real lighter on Ebay, so I'm not sure what "no physical counterpart" means. - Dr Haggis - Talk 20:19, 26 Feb 2005 (MST)
- Update: A quick search on eBay yields about 90 auctions for a BMW lighter currently. I wonder how many of these auctions would not even exist if it weren't for Homestar Runner? —THE PAPER PREEEOW 18:39, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, I actually bought one of these after Drhaggis brought it to my attention in February. I got one of the ones that looks like Strong Bad's and my plan was to take a photo for this page. The thing is pretty much just a silver colored Zippo ripoff with a BMW logo glued on it. I still want to take a photo, but I'd have to find the thing first. I thought I knew where it was, but I can't find it. Hmm. -- Tom 20:33, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Image Overuse?
Are all these images really nessecary? Why not something like this or this? I think that the debut and CGI images are enough for this page. - Joshua 00:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, my goodness, seconded! That's a long freakin' page for a 2"-square object! —AbdiViklas 01:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- The article is like this because back when it was started, there were only three appearances. I don't have a problem with the images. If you don't like the layout, we could probably but them in a nice gallery. -- Tom 01:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
