Talk:Arturo 9000

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Before or after the Happy?: the answer is plain as day (I wish I knew other things to say))
(Before or after the Happy?: reply)
Line 5: Line 5:
::I actually don't think we should assume one way or the other, since that, too, is speculation. How about if I posted a shortened version of the edit? I could replace the third sentence with 'The Arturo 9000 seems to have either replaced the [[Happy 8600]], which Strong Bad destroyed with [[Mountain Dew]] in [[email thunder]], or came before it.' I could optionally remove the 'seems to have' part. --[[Special:Contributions/220.235.114.241|220.235.114.241]] 02:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
::I actually don't think we should assume one way or the other, since that, too, is speculation. How about if I posted a shortened version of the edit? I could replace the third sentence with 'The Arturo 9000 seems to have either replaced the [[Happy 8600]], which Strong Bad destroyed with [[Mountain Dew]] in [[email thunder]], or came before it.' I could optionally remove the 'seems to have' part. --[[Special:Contributions/220.235.114.241|220.235.114.241]] 02:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::I don't think it seems likely that it preceded the Happy 8600, as the numbered Happy emails have numbers that are clearly lower than 62. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 03:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::I don't think it seems likely that it preceded the Happy 8600, as the numbered Happy emails have numbers that are clearly lower than 62. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 03:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::But the happy appeared in email thunder. There is a third option no one seems to have considered, which is he has both of them simultaneously. Remember, the arturo isn't a computer. But seriously, at this point it's pure speculation as we just don't have enough evidence. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 13:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:58, 27 January 2009

Before or after the Happy?

I recently edited this article to say that Arturo may be either a predecessor of or successor to the Happy 8600, but my edit got removed for being, and I quote, 'Not really notable...'. But the fact remains that since email thunder very strongly implied that HREmails ran parallel to SBEmails without our knowing, HREmail 62 is very possibly a past email, and therefore, Arturo is thus probably a predecessor to the Happy. What should our official opinion be? Predecessor or successor? --220.235.114.241 01:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Any such interpretation is speculative in nature, which is mainly why I removed it. -128.103.10.17 01:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I actually don't think we should assume one way or the other, since that, too, is speculation. How about if I posted a shortened version of the edit? I could replace the third sentence with 'The Arturo 9000 seems to have either replaced the Happy 8600, which Strong Bad destroyed with Mountain Dew in email thunder, or came before it.' I could optionally remove the 'seems to have' part. --220.235.114.241 02:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it seems likely that it preceded the Happy 8600, as the numbered Happy emails have numbers that are clearly lower than 62. BBG 03:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
But the happy appeared in email thunder. There is a third option no one seems to have considered, which is he has both of them simultaneously. Remember, the arturo isn't a computer. But seriously, at this point it's pure speculation as we just don't have enough evidence. — Defender1031*Talk 13:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)