User talk:FireBird

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Any comments will be read and I will reply as quickly as I can.

Archives: February 2005, March 2005, April 2005

---

Contents 1 Discussions 1.1 Allrighty Then 1.2 Thanks for your help:) 1.3 Sub-Pages 1.4 Trogga

Discussions

Allrighty Then

My mistake. -- The Real Zajac 17:35, 3 May 2005 (PDT)

It ain't nothin' but a thang. :) →FireBird

---

Thanks for your help:)

thanks for the editing tips for Rock opra visials i was able to add a line! (i was new at the time) --djm1791 07:57, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Your welcome. →FireBird

• dude you have been a load of help tanks --djm1791 06:20, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Just trying to help out. →FireBird

---

Sub-Pages

Hi Fire. I remember reading somewhere quite some time ago, (I think it was on your talk page), that Sub-Pages aren't allowed. Has this policy been changed, or did you get special permission? I'm just curious as to weather or no I too can create Sub-Pages. Thanks. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 18:06, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Yessir, certain subpages are allowed, such as archiving your talk page. HRWiki:User page explains it all. →FireBird

---

Trogga

One more edit and it's blocking time? Heck, I'm ready right now. Let's face it, we have a Troll in our midst. A Troll in Gnome's clothing. So we're in agreement then? One more false move, and blockage? ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 01:07, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

I think s/he's just sick of everyone complaining about his/her crappy edits. So yeah, one more bad edit and we should pull 'em outta here. →FireBird

Well that was your decision to make. Personally, I think 48 hours was a bit harsh, since s/he seemed to be cooling off, and that s/he had already deleted the image. If s/he comes back after this, I would like to give him/her another *close watched* chance. I know s/he's done alot to wreck the wiki, but his/her large list of edits, many of them solid, does show that s/he cares about the wiki. S/he's just... a bit opinionated. In any case, I can't say for sure it was the wrong thing to do. It may be just what s/he needed. I guess time'll tell... ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 00:07, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

I know s/he cares about the wiki, but maybe just a tad to much (as in, so much as to get stubborn and insulting). Just wanted to show that we're serious when we're talking about blocking. I think this will show him/her that s/he needs to stop when someone asks, especially when it's Joey and other sysops. We're not in preschool. →FireBird

I'm kinda neutral on this whole thing. On the one hand, I do agree that Trogga's edits were getting a bit, shall we say, severe in some cases. But, given Trogga's useful edits, I was a little surprised to see that you'd actually banned him. --Jay (Talk) 00:53, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Again, we've threatened to ban him several times and he hasn't stopped. If you think it's too harsh, we could tone it down to 24 hours, but I feel that Trogga needs to know that if he doesn't stop he will get banned. →FireBird

I'm not saying that. I just sorta felt the need to add my two cents, as I've been merely sitting on the sidelines for this whole debacle. Ignore me. PS. Edit conflict redux.--Jay (Talk) 01:00, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Wow, edit conflicted twice in a row. Quite the hot topic. Anyways, I respect your decision. Plus I am kinda relieved, that you made the decision for me. Although I did ask Tom about the whole thing shortly before you blocked Trogga, and he suggested 24 hours next time anything went wrong, which is what I would have gone with. If you wanna shorten it, I'm behind you. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 00:59, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Okay. If Tom says 24 hours, 24 hours it is. →FireBird

---