Talk:Erweenga

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 02:21, 6 December 2009 by Crab Attack1999 (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

No

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Seriously? A character who was given 5 seconds air time, doesn't exist, and is merely a doodle? We really don't need this. At all.--Jellote wuz here 18:07, 5 December 2009 (UCT)

Yes

Erweenga is awesome and he should exist!Jellote, WAT R U TALKING ABOUT?!


WTF HE SHOULD EXIST!

Sorry, anonny. This only appeared once. The guidelines state this had to appear at least three times. It only appeared once. So delete, no discussion.--Record307 Talk/Contribs 18:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
That's for running gags. In regards to characters, it technically only needs to appear once. That said, "Erweenga" is not actually a character, and does not need a page. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 19:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Oops, sorry. Don't remember the list time I checked the guidelines. As for this, a minor book character then.--Record307 Talk/Contribs 21:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
When i saw the part about a stripèd worm, i thought of The Worm. Then i watched this toon, and Erweenga definitely doesn't need a page. The Knights Who Say Ni 22:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Vulgarity does not justify existance. Awesomeness (which he shows no sign of in his five seconds of non-movement, anyway) does not justify existance. Yelling does not justify existance. And lastly, erweenga does not justify making weird pages.--Jellote wuz here 02:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Like usual, I agree with jellote. There's some kind of epidemic going around, making anonnies create Useless Pages. So we should delete. Unless, as the Knights said, we could find a way to add this guy as a variation of The Worm, but that will prove highly unlikely as Erweenga has only been shown once. And we totally don't have a page on 12 times a day man. So no page on Erweenga. CrabAttack1999 02:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Erweenga"
Personal tools