Talk:The Brothers Chaps Singing

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 04:37, 4 November 2009 by FireBird (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Sing out?

I don't really see the point in this article. So, they sing. Your point? Just seems like a bit of a stretch to document as a separate page. wbwolf (t | ed) 00:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

I was under the impression that Running Gags needed three appearances to be considered Running Gags. This has only happened twice. I say scrap it. The Wheelchair 00:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Even if there was a third (which there is arguably, given that it happens twice in the same toon), it seems to me just to be TBC providing vocal background music instead of instrumental. We don't have an article on all the other types of background music, so why should we have an article on this one? — Defender1031*Talk 00:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete cash money tc 00:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey... Pssst... Not to alarm you or anything, but I think TBC sing most of the songs in this site... Ok, for reals, I understand that this is about background music, and not singing actual lyrics. But not enough appearances to make a connection. Delete. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 05:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Well when I created it, I meant it to be them singing without making a character do it. Espemon333 23:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
It seems rather insignificant that we have a page with two, (if you want to get techinal, three) instances where The Brother Chaps sing songs normal. I understand the perpective of trying to document, but I would wait until we have a few more instances before we call this a legitimate page. I think they sang the songs becuase it fitted the toon at the time. There is a HUGE gap between lunch special and On Break. So, Delete. Sbmaniac 23:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't see what's wrong with this article. This is information I've searched for before, and it's got enough appearances to stand on it's own... I definitely don't see it as a "stretch" to document it. The article could use a little work, sure, but it certainly has potential. —FireBird|Talk 04:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)