Template talk:Hremail

From Homestar Runner Wiki

This is the talk page of a deleted article. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

Needed at this point?

I think it's jumping the gun a little to create a navigation template for TWO PAGES. Until and unless Hremails become a regular feature, a navigation template for them is unnecessary. — Defender1031*Talk 23:31, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

AGREED'D -132.183.138.31 23:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Agree'd, too. I made that in the sandbox as a joke. I didn't expect it to be's taken seriously. ThePizz^{√ Pick} 23:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually, three pages. I think it's fine because there are hremails, and they need to have their own template like Sbemail does. — MichaelXX2 01:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Two pages. Two of the links are actually redirects to the same page. And no, they do no need it. — Defender1031*Talk 01:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Hremail 24 itself should not count as an actual Hremail; it's only one frame, and it'd be like counting one still image as an actual Hremail. Even counting Hremail 49 would be a loose judgement. Hremail 49 is extremely short compared to even the shortest Strong Bad Emails. And Hremail 24 and Hremail 49 are only easter eggs, so I wouldn't say that The Brothers Chaps would count these as "official". Delete --69.150.85.66 01:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I support all the arguments that say we don't need this yet. I think there needs to be at least one more real Hremail for this kind of template to be necessary. If we delete it now, it can be restored later should it become more useful. — It's dot com 06:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Dot com's right. If hremails actually become a thing on the website, that would be one thing. — MichaelXX2 06:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)