Talk:Live Action Foods
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Two replies in one! Wow!) |
(→Rename) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::::(edit conflict'd) I'd support "Real Life Foods" or "Photographs of Food". "Photorealistic" carries the implication that the image isn't actually a photograph but an imitation of one. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ::::::(edit conflict'd) I'd support "Real Life Foods" or "Photographs of Food". "Photorealistic" carries the implication that the image isn't actually a photograph but an imitation of one. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::::"Food Photos" would work too. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | :::::::"Food Photos" would work too. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::: "Food Photos" is pretty good, although it doesn’t quite capture that they’re real world photos (as opposed to a character taking a photo of food, in-universe. -[[Special:Contributions/50.234.189.37|50.234.189.37]] 22:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:14, 1 April 2020
Rename
Should this be renamed "Real life foods"? Wolf O'Donnel 06:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- You raise a good point. All of these foods definitely appear to be of the dead variety. --Jay (Gobble) 06:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- I remember making this page back when anonymous users could make pages back in the day. (No, I can't prove it, just take my word for it). Back then I thought "real-live" was a mistake made in haste and would have chosen the title "live-action foods" if I could do it over again. This is also why most of the pages that link to this one use the phrase "live-action". -- 68.37.43.131 13:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (aside) I remember those days. Those were good days. Good days. -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (I support renaming the page) -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- The one problem I have with "live-action foods" is that there's not very much action going on with these. I would support something like "photorealistic foods" or "photographs of food" or something. "Non-Cartoon Foods in Decidedly Cartoon Settings". Something indicative of "these are photos used in cartoons". --DorianGray 20:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Food Photos"? — Defender1031★Talk
21:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict'd) I'd support "Real Life Foods" or "Photographs of Food". "Photorealistic" carries the implication that the image isn't actually a photograph but an imitation of one. DEI
DAT
VSA
┌datvsa center\super contra┘ 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Food Photos" would work too. DEI
DAT
VSA
┌datvsa center\super contra┘ 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Food Photos" is pretty good, although it doesn’t quite capture that they’re real world photos (as opposed to a character taking a photo of food, in-universe. -50.234.189.37 22:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Food Photos" would work too. DEI
DAT
VSA
- "Food Photos"? — Defender1031★Talk
- The one problem I have with "live-action foods" is that there's not very much action going on with these. I would support something like "photorealistic foods" or "photographs of food" or something. "Non-Cartoon Foods in Decidedly Cartoon Settings". Something indicative of "these are photos used in cartoons". --DorianGray 20:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (I support renaming the page) -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (aside) I remember those days. Those were good days. Good days. -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- I remember making this page back when anonymous users could make pages back in the day. (No, I can't prove it, just take my word for it). Back then I thought "real-live" was a mistake made in haste and would have chosen the title "live-action foods" if I could do it over again. This is also why most of the pages that link to this one use the phrase "live-action". -- 68.37.43.131 13:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)