Template talk:Hremail
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Forgot "'''Delete'''") |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Needed at this point?: that isn't really necessary) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Actually, three pages. I think it's fine because there ''are'' hremails, and they need to have their own template like Sbemail does. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 01:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | :::Actually, three pages. I think it's fine because there ''are'' hremails, and they need to have their own template like Sbemail does. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 01:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Two pages. Two of the links are actually redirects to the same page. And no, they do no need it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ::::Two pages. Two of the links are actually redirects to the same page. And no, they do no need it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| - | :::::Hremail 24 itself should not count as an actual Hremail; it's only one frame, and it'd be like counting one still image as an actual Hremail. Even counting Hremail 49 would be a loose judgement. Hremail 49 is extremely short compared to even the shortest Strong Bad Emails. And Hremail 24 and Hremail 49 are only easter eggs, so I wouldn't say that The Brothers Chaps would count these as "official". '''Delete''' --[[Special:Contributions/69.150.85.66|69.150.85.66]] 01:49, 29 January 2009 ( | + | :::::Hremail 24 itself should not count as an actual Hremail; it's only one frame, and it'd be like counting one still image as an actual Hremail. Even counting Hremail 49 would be a loose judgement. Hremail 49 is extremely short compared to even the shortest Strong Bad Emails. And Hremail 24 and Hremail 49 are only easter eggs, so I wouldn't say that The Brothers Chaps would count these as "official". '''Delete''' --[[Special:Contributions/69.150.85.66|69.150.85.66]] 01:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:51, 29 January 2009
Needed at this point?
I think it's jumping the gun a little to create a navigation template for TWO PAGES. Until and unless Hremails become a regular feature, a navigation template for them is unnecessary. — Defender1031*Talk 23:31, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- AGREED'D -132.183.138.31 23:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Agree'd, too. I made that in the sandbox as a joke. I didn't expect it to be's taken seriously.
ThePizz√ Pick 23:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, three pages. I think it's fine because there are hremails, and they need to have their own template like Sbemail does. — MichaelXX2
01:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Two pages. Two of the links are actually redirects to the same page. And no, they do no need it. — Defender1031*Talk 01:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hremail 24 itself should not count as an actual Hremail; it's only one frame, and it'd be like counting one still image as an actual Hremail. Even counting Hremail 49 would be a loose judgement. Hremail 49 is extremely short compared to even the shortest Strong Bad Emails. And Hremail 24 and Hremail 49 are only easter eggs, so I wouldn't say that The Brothers Chaps would count these as "official". Delete --69.150.85.66 01:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Two pages. Two of the links are actually redirects to the same page. And no, they do no need it. — Defender1031*Talk 01:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, three pages. I think it's fine because there are hremails, and they need to have their own template like Sbemail does. — MichaelXX2
- Agree'd, too. I made that in the sandbox as a joke. I didn't expect it to be's taken seriously.
