Talk:hiding
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Soap Box) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:If you ask me, I think we should keep it on both pages; bring the link back and keep it on the duplicated characters page. 00:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC) | :If you ask me, I think we should keep it on both pages; bring the link back and keep it on the duplicated characters page. 00:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:: I agree, there`s no solid evidence that it`s not 2 Strong Mads.-[[User:ThePizz|ThePizz]] | :: I agree, there`s no solid evidence that it`s not 2 Strong Mads.-[[User:ThePizz|ThePizz]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Soap Box == | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK. I've seen this appear and disappear from the Inside References, like, 3 times now. I think that we should link to the soap box page in the Inside References section. Yes, it is already linked to in the Transcript, but we can have both. And if not, we should at least be consistent and have all of the appearences of the soap box be linked in the same way. Right? -[[User:Philip8o|Philip8o]] | ||
Revision as of 00:17, 15 July 2008
Duplicate Strong Mads
This email is featured in the article duplicate characters, but a link to that article was deleted from this already. Should this email be removed from that article? 
BBG 23:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- If you ask me, I think we should keep it on both pages; bring the link back and keep it on the duplicated characters page. 00:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, there`s no solid evidence that it`s not 2 Strong Mads.-ThePizz
Soap Box
OK. I've seen this appear and disappear from the Inside References, like, 3 times now. I think that we should link to the soap box page in the Inside References section. Yes, it is already linked to in the Transcript, but we can have both. And if not, we should at least be consistent and have all of the appearences of the soap box be linked in the same way. Right? -Philip8o
