Talk:Spoken Sound Effects
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(DELETE. Please.) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Needed?: give it a chance and focus on the irght things please) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I could go either way on this. This isn't quite within the scope of [[sound effects]] but i'm not sure there's enough of a connection between the instances to merit a page. Thoughts? (Either way, it needs cleanup) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | I could go either way on this. This isn't quite within the scope of [[sound effects]] but i'm not sure there's enough of a connection between the instances to merit a page. Thoughts? (Either way, it needs cleanup) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think its needed. Ex: Page content doesn't match title in my mind. Expensive for SFX? Nonsense! "Ding" or "Gulp" or even a "Cough" wouldn't be expensive. Expensive should only be used if they can't find, like, a helicopter sound when it's taking off, and they just go "punkity-punkity" in a regular voice. That still wouldn't be very good material for this page. I vote '''DELETE''' for this reason. Maybe if we retitle it to: Inanimate Onomatopoeias, or something like that, my vote will change. But until then...DELETE. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 20:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | :I don't think its needed. Ex: Page content doesn't match title in my mind. Expensive for SFX? Nonsense! "Ding" or "Gulp" or even a "Cough" wouldn't be expensive. Expensive should only be used if they can't find, like, a helicopter sound when it's taking off, and they just go "punkity-punkity" in a regular voice. That still wouldn't be very good material for this page. I vote '''DELETE''' for this reason. Maybe if we retitle it to: Inanimate Onomatopoeias, or something like that, my vote will change. But until then...DELETE. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 20:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Most of your comments are on the current state of hte page rather than what it could be turned into. Give it a chance to be cleaned up and comment on its merits as a potential article, rather than what stands now. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
== Rename == | == Rename == | ||
Assuming this is kept, perhaps a better name would suit it? Heimstern suggested "Vocalized Sound Effects". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | Assuming this is kept, perhaps a better name would suit it? Heimstern suggested "Vocalized Sound Effects". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 25 May 2008
Okay, so I better hope this one is actually okay compared to the Smoldering one. The only thing missing is a picture of someone actually doing one of these fake sound effects.--Silent 20:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC) Edit: Er. That quickly? Er. I'm really, really sorry for that if it does turns out to be a dupe...
Needed?
I could go either way on this. This isn't quite within the scope of sound effects but i'm not sure there's enough of a connection between the instances to merit a page. Thoughts? (Either way, it needs cleanup) — Defender1031*Talk 20:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think its needed. Ex: Page content doesn't match title in my mind. Expensive for SFX? Nonsense! "Ding" or "Gulp" or even a "Cough" wouldn't be expensive. Expensive should only be used if they can't find, like, a helicopter sound when it's taking off, and they just go "punkity-punkity" in a regular voice. That still wouldn't be very good material for this page. I vote DELETE for this reason. Maybe if we retitle it to: Inanimate Onomatopoeias, or something like that, my vote will change. But until then...DELETE. DevonM(talk·cont-ribs) 20:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Most of your comments are on the current state of hte page rather than what it could be turned into. Give it a chance to be cleaned up and comment on its merits as a potential article, rather than what stands now. — Defender1031*Talk 20:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Rename
Assuming this is kept, perhaps a better name would suit it? Heimstern suggested "Vocalized Sound Effects". — Defender1031*Talk 20:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
