Talk:Live Action Foods
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Rename: Maybe concise name?) |
(Two replies in one! Wow!) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::::The one problem I have with "live-action foods" is that there's not very much action going on with these. I would support something like "photorealistic foods" or "photographs of food" or something. "[[licensed|Non-Cartoon Foods in Decidedly Cartoon Settings]]". Something indicative of "these are photos used in cartoons". --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | :::::The one problem I have with "live-action foods" is that there's not very much action going on with these. I would support something like "photorealistic foods" or "photographs of food" or something. "[[licensed|Non-Cartoon Foods in Decidedly Cartoon Settings]]". Something indicative of "these are photos used in cartoons". --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::::"Food Photos"? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ::::::"Food Photos"? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::(edit conflict'd) I'd support "Real Life Foods" or "Photographs of Food". "Photorealistic" carries the implication that the image isn't actually a photograph but an imitation of one. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::"Food Photos" would work too. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:09, 1 April 2020
Rename
Should this be renamed "Real life foods"? Wolf O'Donnel 06:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- You raise a good point. All of these foods definitely appear to be of the dead variety. --Jay (Gobble) 06:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- I remember making this page back when anonymous users could make pages back in the day. (No, I can't prove it, just take my word for it). Back then I thought "real-live" was a mistake made in haste and would have chosen the title "live-action foods" if I could do it over again. This is also why most of the pages that link to this one use the phrase "live-action". -- 68.37.43.131 13:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (aside) I remember those days. Those were good days. Good days. -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (I support renaming the page) -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- The one problem I have with "live-action foods" is that there's not very much action going on with these. I would support something like "photorealistic foods" or "photographs of food" or something. "Non-Cartoon Foods in Decidedly Cartoon Settings". Something indicative of "these are photos used in cartoons". --DorianGray 20:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Food Photos"? — Defender1031*Talk 21:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict'd) I'd support "Real Life Foods" or "Photographs of Food". "Photorealistic" carries the implication that the image isn't actually a photograph but an imitation of one. DEI
DAT
VM
┌datvm center\super contra┘ 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Food Photos" would work too. DEI
DAT
VM
┌datvm center\super contra┘ 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Food Photos" would work too. DEI
DAT
VM
- The one problem I have with "live-action foods" is that there's not very much action going on with these. I would support something like "photorealistic foods" or "photographs of food" or something. "Non-Cartoon Foods in Decidedly Cartoon Settings". Something indicative of "these are photos used in cartoons". --DorianGray 20:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (I support renaming the page) -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- (aside) I remember those days. Those were good days. Good days. -50.234.189.37 14:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- I remember making this page back when anonymous users could make pages back in the day. (No, I can't prove it, just take my word for it). Back then I thought "real-live" was a mistake made in haste and would have chosen the title "live-action foods" if I could do it over again. This is also why most of the pages that link to this one use the phrase "live-action". -- 68.37.43.131 13:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)