Talk:l33t Interview
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (→PG-13?: Fix spelling.) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Plus 'crap' is on a slightly different level from '****', '***', and especially '****'. If we start allowing swears, it would lower the dignity of the Wiki. Before long, people would start swearing on all their talk comments, in the articles, and this wouldn't be a family safe site anymore. Besides, most people who really want to know what's behind the stars can usuall guess by the context, and there is always the source at the bottom too, yes. ''<tt>[[Special:Contributions/Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]][[User:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>Thunderbird</font>]][[User talk:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]]</tt>'' 05:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ::Plus 'crap' is on a slightly different level from '****', '***', and especially '****'. If we start allowing swears, it would lower the dignity of the Wiki. Before long, people would start swearing on all their talk comments, in the articles, and this wouldn't be a family safe site anymore. Besides, most people who really want to know what's behind the stars can usuall guess by the context, and there is always the source at the bottom too, yes. ''<tt>[[Special:Contributions/Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]][[User:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>Thunderbird</font>]][[User talk:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]]</tt>'' 05:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Still, I don't see anything wrong with an uncensored transcript with a warning. While I do hate trolls who add profanity to a family site, what if the site became more vulgar? (highly unlikely, but still) Would we censor transcripts for something that's not for kids anymore? If the interviews gave TBC [[wikipedia:Freedom_of_speech|freedom of speech]], why can't we? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 16:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 29 April 2005
PG-13?
Can you guys give me a good reason why you keep censoring back the interview? Yes, it's wrong to put PG-13 language on a fansite for a PG website, but what's wrong with my foul language warning? I mean, if we censor every swear TBC say, should't we start censoring everytime Strong Bad says "crap" (a swear to some)? --Trogga
- HRWiki:About. No swears. Ever. If someone cares that much about it they can read the actual interview. →FireBird
- Plus 'crap' is on a slightly different level from '****', '***', and especially '****'. If we start allowing swears, it would lower the dignity of the Wiki. Before long, people would start swearing on all their talk comments, in the articles, and this wouldn't be a family safe site anymore. Besides, most people who really want to know what's behind the stars can usuall guess by the context, and there is always the source at the bottom too, yes. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 05:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Still, I don't see anything wrong with an uncensored transcript with a warning. While I do hate trolls who add profanity to a family site, what if the site became more vulgar? (highly unlikely, but still) Would we censor transcripts for something that's not for kids anymore? If the interviews gave TBC freedom of speech, why can't we? --Trogga 16:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
