Talk:time capsule
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Thejesterx (Talk | contribs) (→Standards for Strong Bad Emails) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
What made you think that they had been in a slump? Seriously, explain, because it hadn't really occurred to me. | What made you think that they had been in a slump? Seriously, explain, because it hadn't really occurred to me. | ||
--[[User:Ogoms|Ogoms]] Oct. 4 | --[[User:Ogoms|Ogoms]] Oct. 4 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, the Brothers' Chaps have been in an on-and-off slump for a few months now. --[[User:Dragondoom5|Dragondoom5]] | ||
== Standards for Strong Bad Emails == | == Standards for Strong Bad Emails == | ||
Just wondering if there should be a "Strong Bad Email #X" in the Summary for all Strong Bad Emails? Because it was there in most of them, but not in the most recent ones -- [[User:thejesterx|thejesterx]] 20:08, 4 Oct 2004 (MST) | Just wondering if there should be a "Strong Bad Email #X" in the Summary for all Strong Bad Emails? Because it was there in most of them, but not in the most recent ones -- [[User:thejesterx|thejesterx]] 20:08, 4 Oct 2004 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 06:04, 5 October 2004
This was better than usual in my view. I think the Brothers are coming out of their... funny-block. Anyone agree? -- FireBird
Yeah, for a bit, they kinda went into a slump. The only thing that kept me watching was the hope that they would start being funny again(and Doug the Dino. Gotta love ol' Doug!). Now it seems they may be climbing their way back on top.
--MAX
I wouldn't ever stop watching Homestar Runner. Not for a million years! -- FireBird
Alright, well, I liked The Facts and Cheat Commandos Ep 3 better than this one :) I don't think they've been in a slump for upwards of a month (perhaps 2, perhaps 3) and have been pleased with their contemporate work :)
MetaStar 15:37, 4 Oct 2004 (MST)
What made you think that they had been in a slump? Seriously, explain, because it hadn't really occurred to me. --Ogoms Oct. 4
Yeah, the Brothers' Chaps have been in an on-and-off slump for a few months now. --Dragondoom5
Standards for Strong Bad Emails
Just wondering if there should be a "Strong Bad Email #X" in the Summary for all Strong Bad Emails? Because it was there in most of them, but not in the most recent ones -- thejesterx 20:08, 4 Oct 2004 (MST)
