Talk:51
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (talk) |
(comment) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So this page is called "51", but as it stands, it has one instance of 51, one instance of -51, which isn't quite the same thing. and one instance of -1, which is completely not the same thing. There appears to be nothing special about 51. '''Delete hard and fast'''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC) | So this page is called "51", but as it stands, it has one instance of 51, one instance of -51, which isn't quite the same thing. and one instance of -1, which is completely not the same thing. There appears to be nothing special about 51. '''Delete hard and fast'''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. Although I added an appearence, I don't really see the point of this page. At the very least, we should remove the 1 appearence. That's completly unrelated. We could change it to +/- 51 and keep the three instances. Would three be enough to keep it? [[User:Philip8o|Philip8o]] 19:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC) | :I agree. Although I added an appearence, I don't really see the point of this page. At the very least, we should remove the 1 appearence. That's completly unrelated. We could change it to +/- 51 and keep the three instances. Would three be enough to keep it? [[User:Philip8o|Philip8o]] 19:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It ''is'' slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:12, 28 November 2009
Totally disjointed
So this page is called "51", but as it stands, it has one instance of 51, one instance of -51, which isn't quite the same thing. and one instance of -1, which is completely not the same thing. There appears to be nothing special about 51. Delete hard and fast. — Defender1031*Talk 19:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Although I added an appearence, I don't really see the point of this page. At the very least, we should remove the 1 appearence. That's completly unrelated. We could change it to +/- 51 and keep the three instances. Would three be enough to keep it? Philip8o 19:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Removing the -1 reference, having only three references to the number is not notable. It is slightly interesting that all of references are for points/score, but that's not enough to hold a page. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)