Talk:Might Could
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
MichaelXX2 (Talk | contribs) (discussion) |
(add section, and if you're going to turn this into a debate...) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ttbd}} | {{ttbd}} | ||
+ | ==Scope== | ||
Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.171|132.183.151.171]] 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.171|132.183.151.171]] 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:That's what [[Deliberately Poor English]] is for. This is just to document a specific bad grammarism that's appeared a noteble amount of times. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 21:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | :That's what [[Deliberately Poor English]] is for. This is just to document a specific bad grammarism that's appeared a noteble amount of times. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 21:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I think this is a shorter section of [[Engrish]]. '''Delete'''. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ::I think this is a shorter section of [[Engrish]]. '''Delete'''. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random [[malapropisms]] that are in [[Engrish]]. '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:03, 9 February 2009
Scope
Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -132.183.151.171 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's what Deliberately Poor English is for. This is just to document a specific bad grammarism that's appeared a noteble amount of times.
Dr. Clash 21:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a shorter section of Engrish. Delete. — MichaelXX2
22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random malapropisms that are in Engrish. Keep wbwolf (t | ed) 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a shorter section of Engrish. Delete. — MichaelXX2