User talk:MichaelXX2
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
MichaelXX2 (Talk | contribs) (→Policing again: reply) |
MichaelXX2 (Talk | contribs) (Well, reply and this is really getting out of hand. I need to stop policing and I need to know where the boundaries are because I'm basically like a dog in a new electric fence and I'm running out of) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::I fail to see how this is relevant, MichaelXX2. You have been warned not to police the wiki because it is something that you get wrong too often. And here, you got it wrong again. Even reverting a perfectly good edit by a sysop. As the link to your talk page archive shows, you have even been warned that you might be blocked. I have to tell you that this is not an empty threat. Please stop policing the wiki or you will be blocked from editing. Policing the wiki includes for example telling other users that they did something wrong or even warning them, and reverting ''any'' edit by another user.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 08:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ::I fail to see how this is relevant, MichaelXX2. You have been warned not to police the wiki because it is something that you get wrong too often. And here, you got it wrong again. Even reverting a perfectly good edit by a sysop. As the link to your talk page archive shows, you have even been warned that you might be blocked. I have to tell you that this is not an empty threat. Please stop policing the wiki or you will be blocked from editing. Policing the wiki includes for example telling other users that they did something wrong or even warning them, and reverting ''any'' edit by another user.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 08:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I meant Dot com has reverted a sysop in the past who has reverted a person who vandalized/spammed their own talk page before. I was going for that edit. No offense, but I feel like I'm getting a nail driven through my head. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 08:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | :::I meant Dot com has reverted a sysop in the past who has reverted a person who vandalized/spammed their own talk page before. I was going for that edit. No offense, but I feel like I'm getting a nail driven through my head. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 08:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::At least I'm not going crazy and swearing and saying I'm not doing anything wrong and stuff. I'll try to set boundaries for policing just as a dog would to an invisible electric fence. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 09:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:00, 2 January 2009
Main | Talk | Contributions | My signature User:MichaelXX2/Archivenav Welcome to the Talk section of my User page!
Contents |
Image edits
Heylo, MichaelXX2. Good jorb on touching up those pictures! :-) Just make sure you're not going overboard. For example, here, the "strange smudge thing" was actually his armpit, and here, the "blue speck" was actually a bit of the sky. ;-) Loafing
08:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- I knew it was a bit of the sky here, but I thought it looked rather strange and out-of-place. — MichaelXX2
17:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Awake or asleep userbox
Hi, MichaelXX2! The userbox that you got from my user page is still set to have the sleep/wake times of 6am and 9pm Pacific Standard/Daylight Time. So, you might want to replace theAmerica/Los_Angeles
in the userbox with a city from here that's the closest to Ruston. Happy New Year! — fuchsiania 17:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks! Probably Monroe or Shreveport will do. — MichaelXX2 19:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Strong Bad DVD pictures
Sorry if this makes it sound like your work was all for naught, but can you please re-upload those pictures so they show the front covers? And the articles for Discs 1-3 can finally match those of Discs 4-6? 
BBG 03:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Policing again
You've been asked before not to police. I'm going to extend that to include reverting sysops who are themselves enforcing the rules. Please don't do it again. — Defender1031*Talk 07:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Dot com has reverted users who have reverted their own talk page before, Danny. — MichaelXX2 08:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- I fail to see how this is relevant, MichaelXX2. You have been warned not to police the wiki because it is something that you get wrong too often. And here, you got it wrong again. Even reverting a perfectly good edit by a sysop. As the link to your talk page archive shows, you have even been warned that you might be blocked. I have to tell you that this is not an empty threat. Please stop policing the wiki or you will be blocked from editing. Policing the wiki includes for example telling other users that they did something wrong or even warning them, and reverting any edit by another user. Loafing 08:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- I meant Dot com has reverted a sysop in the past who has reverted a person who vandalized/spammed their own talk page before. I was going for that edit. No offense, but I feel like I'm getting a nail driven through my head. — MichaelXX2 08:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- At least I'm not going crazy and swearing and saying I'm not doing anything wrong and stuff. I'll try to set boundaries for policing just as a dog would to an invisible electric fence. — MichaelXX2 09:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- At least I'm not going crazy and swearing and saying I'm not doing anything wrong and stuff. I'll try to set boundaries for policing just as a dog would to an invisible electric fence. — MichaelXX2
- I meant Dot com has reverted a sysop in the past who has reverted a person who vandalized/spammed their own talk page before. I was going for that edit. No offense, but I feel like I'm getting a nail driven through my head. — MichaelXX2
- I fail to see how this is relevant, MichaelXX2. You have been warned not to police the wiki because it is something that you get wrong too often. And here, you got it wrong again. Even reverting a perfectly good edit by a sysop. As the link to your talk page archive shows, you have even been warned that you might be blocked. I have to tell you that this is not an empty threat. Please stop policing the wiki or you will be blocked from editing. Policing the wiki includes for example telling other users that they did something wrong or even warning them, and reverting any edit by another user. Loafing
