Talk:The Cheat's Privileges
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
												
			
		| DorianGray  (Talk | contribs)  (Good question.) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ::Okay, a year later, why ''is'' this here? It does seem redundant. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ::Okay, a year later, why ''is'' this here? It does seem redundant. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Yep... It's not like they were ever mentioned again, either. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | :::Yep... It's not like they were ever mentioned again, either. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Well, it hasn't been deleted.  You wanna kill it, fine.  Kill it if you must. The lone voice of the creator can hardly defend an article if I have 4 outside influences voting against it.  Just adds to the red side of the ratio.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:35, 29 May 2007
I think this is all pretty well covered on privileges. — Has Matt? (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- I second that.  And even if it wasn't, it's not really an inside joke. -Unknownwarrior33 00:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, a year later, why is this here? It does seem redundant. — It's dot com 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yep... It's not like they were ever mentioned again, either. --DorianGray 21:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 
 
- Okay, a year later, why is this here? It does seem redundant. — It's dot com 21:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
