Talk:C.H.E.A.T.

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Eh)
(I won't question that)
Line 3: Line 3:
:It's a game, and games are Items. Items can have an article even after one appearance. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
:It's a game, and games are Items. Items can have an article even after one appearance. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
::Yeah, just look at [[Three-to-One Marny]]. {{User:The_Spainish_Inquisition/sig}} 11:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
::Yeah, just look at [[Three-to-One Marny]]. {{User:The_Spainish_Inquisition/sig}} 11:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
== I won't question that ==
 +
 +
This may be forum material or whatever, but I just thought I'd throw out: I expected someone to question the reference to E.T. Not because ''I'' question it; I don't. It's a 100% valid reference. But for some reason, I expected someone to argue against it anyway, even to the point of STUFFing. I'm not complaining, though... --{{User:Jay/sig}} 12:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:17, 17 September 2006

Eh

Do you really think this is important enough to have an article? It's just an easteregg. Leave the info at "trading cards" please. --AlbertoTheOdd

It's a game, and games are Items. Items can have an article even after one appearance. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 09:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, just look at Three-to-One Marny. The Spainish Inquisition 11:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I won't question that

This may be forum material or whatever, but I just thought I'd throw out: I expected someone to question the reference to E.T. Not because I question it; I don't. It's a 100% valid reference. But for some reason, I expected someone to argue against it anyway, even to the point of STUFFing. I'm not complaining, though... --Jay (Gobble) 12:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools