Talk:C.H.E.A.T.
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Eh) |
(I won't question that) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:It's a game, and games are Items. Items can have an article even after one appearance. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | :It's a game, and games are Items. Items can have an article even after one appearance. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, just look at [[Three-to-One Marny]]. {{User:The_Spainish_Inquisition/sig}} 11:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ::Yeah, just look at [[Three-to-One Marny]]. {{User:The_Spainish_Inquisition/sig}} 11:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == I won't question that == | ||
+ | |||
+ | This may be forum material or whatever, but I just thought I'd throw out: I expected someone to question the reference to E.T. Not because ''I'' question it; I don't. It's a 100% valid reference. But for some reason, I expected someone to argue against it anyway, even to the point of STUFFing. I'm not complaining, though... --{{User:Jay/sig}} 12:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:17, 17 September 2006
Eh
Do you really think this is important enough to have an article? It's just an easteregg. Leave the info at "trading cards" please. --AlbertoTheOdd
- It's a game, and games are Items. Items can have an article even after one appearance. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 09:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, just look at Three-to-One Marny. The Spainish Inquisition 11:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I won't question that
This may be forum material or whatever, but I just thought I'd throw out: I expected someone to question the reference to E.T. Not because I question it; I don't. It's a 100% valid reference. But for some reason, I expected someone to argue against it anyway, even to the point of STUFFing. I'm not complaining, though... --Jay (Gobble) 12:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)