User talk:Shadow Hog
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Shadow Hog (Talk | contribs) (Reply) |
(nitpicky!) |
||
| (includes 4 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
--(Sean) | --(Sean) | ||
:I always thought that was what [[HRWiki:Select The Usable Fun Facts]] was for? I mean, if there are some that bother you, move them there to be voted on. --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 16:17, 2 Dec 2004 (MST) | :I always thought that was what [[HRWiki:Select The Usable Fun Facts]] was for? I mean, if there are some that bother you, move them there to be voted on. --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 16:17, 2 Dec 2004 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~Frogz | ||
| + | thanks for pointing out my mistake in editing virus, having the * on 2 lines without a crlf(enter) caused the wiki to bug up | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Re: "Roman numerals" in best thing-- | ||
| + | Those aren't Roman numerals, those are Arabic numerals. ;) [[User:Homestar Coder|Aurora Szalinski]] 21:35, 9 Mar 2005 (MST) | ||
| + | :Ah, point. Sorry, I'm VERY tired right now; at least you understood what I meant. :P --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 22:42, 9 Mar 2005 (MST) | ||
| + | ::Yeah, I'm just being a nitpicker, don't mind me. :) [[User:Homestar Coder|Aurora Szalinski]] 23:03, 9 Mar 2005 (MST) | ||
Current revision as of 06:03, 10 March 2005
To: Shadow Hog
Re: animal
Alright, so maybe the titles were a bit harsh, but the truth is that most of the things catagorized under 'fun facts' are not even close to being facts. I don't want to be an arbitrator, but someone has to edit the page and put them under the right heading. 134.10.9.173 09:53, 2 Dec 2004 (MST)
--(Sean)
- I always thought that was what HRWiki:Select The Usable Fun Facts was for? I mean, if there are some that bother you, move them there to be voted on. --Shadow Hog 16:17, 2 Dec 2004 (MST)
~~Frogz thanks for pointing out my mistake in editing virus, having the * on 2 lines without a crlf(enter) caused the wiki to bug up
Re: "Roman numerals" in best thing--
Those aren't Roman numerals, those are Arabic numerals. ;) Aurora Szalinski 21:35, 9 Mar 2005 (MST)
- Ah, point. Sorry, I'm VERY tired right now; at least you understood what I meant. :P --Shadow Hog 22:42, 9 Mar 2005 (MST)
- Yeah, I'm just being a nitpicker, don't mind me. :) Aurora Szalinski 23:03, 9 Mar 2005 (MST)
