Talk:l33t Interview
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (→PG-13?: Added to comment.) |
(Re: Trogga, +To F-Bird's Exp.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:[[HRWiki:About]]. No swears. Ever. If someone cares that much about it they can read the actual interview. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>'' | :[[HRWiki:About]]. No swears. Ever. If someone cares that much about it they can read the actual interview. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Plus 'crap' is on a slightly different level from '****', '****', and especially '****'. If we start allowing swears, it would lower the dignity of the Wiki. Before long, people would start swearing on all their talk comments, in the articles, and this wouldn't be a family safe site anymore. Besides, most people who really want to know what's behind the stars can usuall guess by the context, and there is always the source at the bottom too, yes. ''<tt>[[Special:Contributions/Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]][[User:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>Thunderbird</font>]][[User talk:Thunderbird L17|<font color=gold>⇔</font>]]</tt>'' 05:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:11, 29 April 2005
PG-13?
Can you guys give me a good reason why you keep censoring back the interview? Yes, it's wrong to put PG-13 language on a fansite for a PG website, but what's wrong with my foul language warning? I mean, if we censor every swear TBC say, should't we start censoring everytime Strong Bad says "crap" (a swear to some)? --Trogga
- HRWiki:About. No swears. Ever. If someone cares that much about it they can read the actual interview. →FireBird
- Plus 'crap' is on a slightly different level from '****', '****', and especially '****'. If we start allowing swears, it would lower the dignity of the Wiki. Before long, people would start swearing on all their talk comments, in the articles, and this wouldn't be a family safe site anymore. Besides, most people who really want to know what's behind the stars can usuall guess by the context, and there is always the source at the bottom too, yes. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 05:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
