Talk:Rankin/Bass
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Cash Money (Talk | contribs) (→Enough references?: modeling commentary) |
(→Enough references?) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Usually, we require references in three toons for a page like this. Thoughts? Possibility of a third that I and the person who made the page both overlooked? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC) | Usually, we require references in three toons for a page like this. Thoughts? Possibility of a third that I and the person who made the page both overlooked? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:There's a reference in the commentary for [[modeling]]. {{User:Movie magic man/sig}} 19:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC) | :There's a reference in the commentary for [[modeling]]. {{User:Movie magic man/sig}} 19:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::I don't really see a reference to Rankin/Bass in the commentary of [[modeling]].. all I really see is a reference to the song "Winter Wonderland", despite what the Fun Fact says. In this case, though, the two references might be interesting enough. Leaning toward '''keep'''. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:12, 27 December 2010
Enough references?
Usually, we require references in three toons for a page like this. Thoughts? Possibility of a third that I and the person who made the page both overlooked? --Jay (Gobble) 19:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- There's a reference in the commentary for modeling. cash money tc 19:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- I don't really see a reference to Rankin/Bass in the commentary of modeling.. all I really see is a reference to the song "Winter Wonderland", despite what the Fun Fact says. In this case, though, the two references might be interesting enough. Leaning toward keep.
OptimisticFool 19:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- I don't really see a reference to Rankin/Bass in the commentary of modeling.. all I really see is a reference to the song "Winter Wonderland", despite what the Fun Fact says. In this case, though, the two references might be interesting enough. Leaning toward keep.