|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:MichaelXX2&action=edit§ion=new http://forum.hrwiki.org/styles/subsilver2/imageset/en/button_topic_new.gif}} {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:MichaelXX2&action=edit http://forum.hrwiki.org/styles/subsilver2/imageset/en/button_topic_reply.gif}} | | {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:MichaelXX2&action=edit§ion=new http://forum.hrwiki.org/styles/subsilver2/imageset/en/button_topic_new.gif}} {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:MichaelXX2&action=edit http://forum.hrwiki.org/styles/subsilver2/imageset/en/button_topic_reply.gif}} |
| | </center> | | </center> |
| - | == Image edits ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Heylo, MichaelXX2. Good jorb on touching up those pictures! :-) Just make sure you're not going overboard. For example, [[:Image:Bubs 3D variation.PNG|here]], the "strange smudge thing" was actually his armpit, and [[:Image:Coach Z as Queen Latifah.png|here]], the "blue speck" was actually a bit of the sky. ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 08:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :I knew it was a bit of the sky [[:Image:Coach Z as Queen Latifah.png|here]], but I thought it looked rather strange and out-of-place. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 17:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::i agree, out of place. it doesn't really fit. {{User:Homsarstrongbad150/sig}} 15:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Awake or asleep userbox ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Hi, MichaelXX2! The userbox that you got from my user page is still set to have the sleep/wake times of 6am and 9pm '''Pacific Standard/Daylight Time'''. So, you might want to replace the <div style="font-family:monospace">America/Los_Angeles</div> in the userbox with a city from [http://us.php.net/manual/en/timezones.america.php here] that's the closest to Ruston. Happy New Year! — {{User:Fotoshop/sig}} 17:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Oh, thanks! Probably Monroe or Shreveport will do. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 19:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Strong Bad DVD pictures ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Sorry if this makes it sound like your work was all for naught, but can you please re-upload those pictures so they show the ''front'' covers? And the articles for Discs 1-3 can finally match those of Discs 4-6? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 03:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Done. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 23:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Policing again ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | You've been asked before [[User:MichaelXX2/Talkarchivetwo#Policing|not to police]]. I'm going to extend that to include [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Henryharry&diff=620912&oldid=620891&rcid=579595 reverting sysops who are themselves enforcing the rules]. Please don't do it again. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 07:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Dot com has reverted users who have reverted their own talk page before, Danny. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 08:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::I fail to see how this is relevant, MichaelXX2. You have been warned not to police the wiki because it is something that you get wrong too often. And here, you got it wrong again. Even reverting a perfectly good edit by a sysop. As the link to your talk page archive shows, you have even been warned that you might be blocked. I have to tell you that this is not an empty threat. Please stop policing the wiki or you will be blocked from editing. Policing the wiki includes for example telling other users that they did something wrong or even warning them, and reverting ''any'' edit by another user.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 08:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::I meant Dot com has reverted a sysop in the past who has reverted a person who vandalized/spammed their own talk page before. I was going for that edit. No offense, but I feel like I'm getting a nail driven through my head. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 08:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::At least I'm not going crazy and swearing and saying I'm not doing anything wrong and stuff. I'll try to set boundaries for policing just as a dog would to an invisible electric fence. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 09:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::Not that it changes much, but I am curious to know when and where this edit of Dot com's is. Would you be able to provide a link to the diff you're referring to? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 09:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::::I'm looking for it. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 09:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::::We don't seem to be getting through to you, so I'm going to give you a few weeks to think about it. Hopefully you can see that we're serious about your not policing the wiki. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | ::::::::if i'm hearing you correctly, and i think that i am, mike's banned again. see, mike, told you. they're too strict 'round here. <!--i still don't know what they mean by policing. i think they might have made it up to ban you. :P but seriously, what does it mean? i think i know, but i really don't. and, mike, remember, DC's strict, not mean. just making sure you remember. :) and i still have no freaking clue what--wiat. wait, i figured out what policing is. it means he did something wrong, or, no he tried to tell someone how to do something and did ''that'' wrong, right? i think that's it.--> {{User:Homsarstrongbad150/sig}} 14:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::::::::First of all, they didn't make up some dumb thing to ban me about. They had a good reason. I was telling other users that they did something wrong, but I wasn't putting it in correct terms. They had all the reason in the world to block me for that time and I don't have any complaints. Try to understand your uppers, Homsarstrongbad150. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::::::::::I'm glad you understand why you were blocked. But it appears you're still not getting it: [http://hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Template_talk:!&curid=31559&diff=625088&oldid=517760&rcid=583871 This] is also policing. Since it doesn't seem to be sinking in, I'm going to put it in bold: '''do not attempt to enforce policy.''' Ask a sysop to help if you really must. If you continue, I think it's fair to say you're going to get blocked again. Take this as a warning. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | ==OK==
| |
| - | Okay. I'll stop. But what's wrong with them? [[User:Ahhhlehhh|Ahhhlehhh]] 03:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :It's not exactly necessary to have every little movement like that (given how unorganized it is) monitored. We need to have what they say, not what exactly happens. Sorry to crush your hopes and dreams, {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 03:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Thanks! ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Michael, thanks for the help on my question. Ever since I joined the site, I have been repeatedly amazed on how quickly things are accomplished here. Thanks again, keep up the good work! -{{User:Opus the Penguin/sig}} 02:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :You're welcome! Well, I do my best. I'm sure others have done better. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::Not that i've seen. I've never posted a question and had a video tutorial on youtube about it within the hour. And about the subject, that wasn't exactly what I meant, but it was a really good idea! I think I might do it while i'm waiting around for It's Dot Com to design a blockquote class, if he does it at all. -{{User:Opus the Penguin/sig}} 02:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::Something tells me that it might be a while. Maybe in the year 3970, if we're lucky. :D {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == White backgrounds. ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Hey Michael, what was the program you used to whiten the background in the Twelve Times a Day Man image? Was it just MS Paint? -{{User:Opus the Penguin/sig}} 03:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Yeah, it was Paint. Why? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 11:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::Just wondering. I've tried doing that before, but I always end up screwing up the outline. Any tips? -{{User:Opus the Penguin/sig}} 02:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::It mostly depends on the image you're doing it on. Works with some, screws up others. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Regarding [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User:MichaelXX2&diff=next&oldid=625076 this edit] ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Yes, i can. The resolution is different on different monitors and it doesn't stretch or shrink to fit anymore. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Response ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | In response to [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:70.105.71.209&diff=626330&oldid=626329&rcid=585122 this edit], no i did not. I purposely did not use subst. Please, please, PLEASE, stop policing the wiki. This includes modifying other users' posts when you think they should be modified. I posted the way i did for a reason, and i didn't need you to come along and "fix" it for me. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Image Summaries ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Hey there, i wasn't sure if you were aware, but the first time an image is uploaded, the upload summary becomes the text on the image page, so when uploading new images, you may want to write a better description than things like "An image. You'll see its use.". I personally usually write something like "<nowiki>description of picture with [[necessary things linked]], from [[name of toon]]</nowiki>". It's descriptive and looks a lot nicer. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Okay, okay. I'm very busy working on a page. I'll take your advice. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Thank you for making my contrast-button comparison between some kinda robot and homsar not too big!! --[[User:Fangoriously|Fangoriously]] 03:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :No problem. Cropping is my thing. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 11:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Sig Color Change ==
| |
| - | Hey man. I'm comin to you for a sig change this time. Well, Not really a sig change just a sig '''color''' change. Anyway, I would like my username in my sig to be valentines colored (including the talk/contribs thing) You don't have to change the record player that's fine. Can you do that? Much appreciated!-{{User:Record307/sig}} 18:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :So, red and light red then? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::Exactly! Thanks!-{{User:Record307/sig}} 22:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::You can change it back. Thanks again for the color change!-{{User:Record307/sig}} 19:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | == HRWiki:Introduction ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Re: [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Introduction&curid=7031&diff=628482&oldid=628463&rcid=587322 this] You said in your edit summary "rv/v," but what you edit on the introduction page isn't vandalism unless it's insulting or provocative. It's a test page, similar to the Sandbox. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Yeah, I just figured that out as I reverted it. Weird. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 00:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | ==Hrmail and Hrmails==
| |
| - | Hello, um, I'm the person who made the hrmail and hrmails pages. I realize that some people may accidently misspell the word HRemail, either by typing in hrmail or hremails, all lower-case, so, as to make it easier for people to go around the wiki, I wanted to make redirects, so people who searched for hrmail or hrmails would go to the HRemail page.
| |
| - |
| |
| - | I hope you understand, I guess. I want to know, what does "redirect will pipe itself" mean?--[[Special:Contributions/72.208.76.124|72.208.76.124]] 22:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | : It means that if you search or link with all lowercase letters, it will automatically find the correct case if both pages aren't separate. I don't think hrmail would work like that, but it would be pretty unusual to make that mistake. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Civility ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Michael, please use more civility in your edit summaries. Summaries such as {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Weekly_Fanstuff&curid=908&diff=629803&oldid=629802&rcid=588681 this}} could either offend or demean someone. So, please refrain from this in the future. Thanks, {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 04:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Move ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Why doesn't your link that says it moves your page when clicked actually move your user page?? --[[User:Fangoriously|Fangoriously]] 05:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :You actually ''tried'' that? XD It's just a trick link. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 05:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Sysop ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Why do you and Deffy look to be sysops? I found out that they're not. --[[User:Fangoriously|Fangoriously!]] [[User talk:Fangoriously|Chat]] 18:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :What are you asking/saying? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::Why do we look to be sysops? Why do we ''want'' to be sysops? Tell me, I can't understand you. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 19:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::The many contributions that you make have you look to be sysops. --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 03:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::Oh, I get it. Thank you, I think... {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Eggs (Inside Joke) ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Was there a consensus towards using that name, or should I move it back? I can't find any rename discussion on the talk page. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 20:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :There wasn't a consensus, I just needed to rename it so it could go on the disambig page. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 20:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Ren ==
| |
| - | I know your with me when I say '''STOP THAT REN'''.{{User:Record307/sig}} 01:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :He's a vandal. We need to team up to destroy him! Friends? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 01:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::'''Deal''' But somebody already blocked him.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Using Bold in Image Summaries ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Hey, thanks for helping us out with the ongoing Image Summary Cleanup. Listen, I need to talk to you something I was contacted about by Defender1031 [[User talk:The Chort#Good Jorb|on my talk page here]]. Apparently, there's no need whatsoever to use '''bold tags''' in the image summaries, as there are no standards nor consistancy with them. Do you suppose we should adapt your [[Template:from|from template]] by removing the bold tags there, as we might end up with weird autoformatting [[:Image:AtOff.png|like this]]? What I'm saying is if one of us is adding bold tags and the other is removing them, that kind of defeats the purpose of an image summary cleanup, so we need to come to an agreement over this issue. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 21:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :I think the bold tags are needed because then you pay more attention to it. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}
| |
| - | ::Another question. Is that from template even that useful? You still need to type in the item's/character's name, maybe a piped link and link to the toon where the image came from. Is it really so hard to type "[[The Poopsmith]] (from [[disconnected]])"? Do we really need a template to do this simple task, possibly making things a bit more complicated in the process? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 21:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | :::I thought it was useful to get the formatting right for templates. If we ever want to change what the edit summaries look like, it would be a matter of changing one page instead of hundreds. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| - | ::::But now that I look at it, it really puts the edit summaries in a box. I think it's unneeded. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
Main | Talk | Contributions | My signature 
