Talk:Get Outta My X
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Unusual?: reply) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::::[[HRWiki:Spoons|Yes there is.]] {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | :::::[[HRWiki:Spoons|Yes there is.]] {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::That's for mundane objects. As one who has complained about that very page, you should see the difference, here. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 01:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ::::::That's for mundane objects. As one who has complained about that very page, you should see the difference, here. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 01:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::I think that anything that's used in a mundane way doesn't deserve its own page. I don't think that rule is specifically limited to objects. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:32, 26 February 2009
Unusual?
It seems to me that this common phrase has never been used in an unusual way. This seems like an example of a mundane thing that occurs because it fits where it happens. — Defender1031*Talk 23:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like another "Awesome" article to me. Delete
BBG 23:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used more consistently than awesome. I think it's valid. -132.183.138.34 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used consistently in decidedly ordinary places, where one would expect it to be used. — Defender1031*Talk 01:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- There's no rule that we can't document ordinary things. A manner of speech that Strong Bad repeatedly uses is notable imo. -132.183.138.34 01:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes there is. — Defender1031*Talk 01:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's for mundane objects. As one who has complained about that very page, you should see the difference, here. -132.183.138.34 01:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think that anything that's used in a mundane way doesn't deserve its own page. I don't think that rule is specifically limited to objects. — Defender1031*Talk 01:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's for mundane objects. As one who has complained about that very page, you should see the difference, here. -132.183.138.34 01:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes there is. — Defender1031*Talk 01:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- There's no rule that we can't document ordinary things. A manner of speech that Strong Bad repeatedly uses is notable imo. -132.183.138.34 01:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used consistently in decidedly ordinary places, where one would expect it to be used. — Defender1031*Talk 01:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used more consistently than awesome. I think it's valid. -132.183.138.34 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)