Talk:Get Outta My X
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Unusual?: consistency is not the deciding factor) |
(Rather, it's not the deciding factor, in your opinion) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::It's used more consistently than awesome. I think it's valid. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ::It's used more consistently than awesome. I think it's valid. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::It's used consistently in decidedly ordinary places, where one would expect it to be used. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | :::It's used consistently in decidedly ordinary places, where one would expect it to be used. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::There's no rule that we can't document ordinary things. A manner of speech that Strong Bad repeatedly uses is notable imo. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 01:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:26, 26 February 2009
Unusual?
It seems to me that this common phrase has never been used in an unusual way. This seems like an example of a mundane thing that occurs because it fits where it happens. — Defender1031*Talk 23:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like another "Awesome" article to me. Delete
BBG 23:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used more consistently than awesome. I think it's valid. -132.183.138.34 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used consistently in decidedly ordinary places, where one would expect it to be used. — Defender1031*Talk 01:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- There's no rule that we can't document ordinary things. A manner of speech that Strong Bad repeatedly uses is notable imo. -132.183.138.34 01:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used consistently in decidedly ordinary places, where one would expect it to be used. — Defender1031*Talk 01:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's used more consistently than awesome. I think it's valid. -132.183.138.34 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)