Talk:Credit Cards
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
DorianGray (Talk | contribs) (Reply) |
(Replied to - →Poll: and moved the "Delete" section's content to the original discussion, which I have also headed as "Delete". Removed "Save It " Section") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Delete== | ||
We don't need this. They aren't here a lot. {{User:Sylar/sig}} 00:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | We don't need this. They aren't here a lot. {{User:Sylar/sig}} 00:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
: On one hand, we could theoretically make this a real page after turning it into "List of Credit Card Numbers" or something like that. Still, I'm perfectly fine with dropping it and almost deleted it without even letting the discussion pan out. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | : On one hand, we could theoretically make this a real page after turning it into "List of Credit Card Numbers" or something like that. Still, I'm perfectly fine with dropping it and almost deleted it without even letting the discussion pan out. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
:::::Yet it only takes 3 times to constitute a running gag. Also, there's the Downloads easter egg. {{User:Strongkinghomsarsmith/sig}} 00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | :::::Yet it only takes 3 times to constitute a running gag. Also, there's the Downloads easter egg. {{User:Strongkinghomsarsmith/sig}} 00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::::Wow. I can't believe I might actually be the cause of keeping this thing. Before I got edit conflict'd with Strongkinghomsarsmith, I was about to say, Jay approved a couple of articles that I haven't made yet, each having three sources (currently). --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233|75.5.176.233]] 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ::::::Wow. I can't believe I might actually be the cause of keeping this thing. Before I got edit conflict'd with Strongkinghomsarsmith, I was about to say, Jay approved a couple of articles that I haven't made yet, each having three sources (currently). --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233|75.5.176.233]] 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| - | + | :::::::'''*boom!*''' [[User:Kumquaticus|Kumquaticus]] 21:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |
== Poll == | == Poll == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
Answer below. | Answer below. | ||
:We don't do it this way. We reach concensus by lengthy discussion, not voting. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | :We don't do it this way. We reach concensus by lengthy discussion, not voting. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| - | + | ::Oh, how I miss [[HRWiki:STUFF|STUFF]]. I wish I was a member while it lasted. --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233|75.5.176.233]] 22:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |
| - | + | ||
| - | - | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 9 December 2008
Delete
We don't need this. They aren't here a lot. Raiku 00:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- On one hand, we could theoretically make this a real page after turning it into "List of Credit Card Numbers" or something like that. Still, I'm perfectly fine with dropping it and almost deleted it without even letting the discussion pan out. --Jay (Gobble) 00:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: Not enugh numbers on the website. Raiku 00:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Though I think this might been a Spoons-type article, I think it can be legit. We have at least three sources: credit card, 4 branches, and Coach Z's 110%. But we should move this to "Credit Cards".
- Delete: Not enugh numbers on the website. Raiku 00:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Not saying I don't think it should be Deleted. --75.5.176.233 00:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Only three sources isn't that big. Raiku 00:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yet it only takes 3 times to constitute a running gag. Also, there's the Downloads easter egg. Strongking
homsarsmith 00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. I can't believe I might actually be the cause of keeping this thing. Before I got edit conflict'd with Strongkinghomsarsmith, I was about to say, Jay approved a couple of articles that I haven't made yet, each having three sources (currently). --75.5.176.233 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- *boom!* Kumquaticus 21:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. I can't believe I might actually be the cause of keeping this thing. Before I got edit conflict'd with Strongkinghomsarsmith, I was about to say, Jay approved a couple of articles that I haven't made yet, each having three sources (currently). --75.5.176.233 00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yet it only takes 3 times to constitute a running gag. Also, there's the Downloads easter egg. Strongking
- Only three sources isn't that big. Raiku 00:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Not saying I don't think it should be Deleted. --75.5.176.233 00:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Poll
I think it has come down to a vote. Let's take a poll...
Should "card numbers" be deleted? Answer below.
- We don't do it this way. We reach concensus by lengthy discussion, not voting. --DorianGray 21:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, how I miss STUFF. I wish I was a member while it lasted. --75.5.176.233 22:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
