Talk:Police

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:police moved to Talk:Police: capitalization)
(Deletion Discussion: delete or redirect)
Line 3: Line 3:
Umm, an article about something that DOESN'T appear? this is a new one... '''Delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Umm, an article about something that DOESN'T appear? this is a new one... '''Delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:Well, unless you count [[Lack of Visible Arms]]... =3 But yeah. This is essentially covered by the second paragraph on [[Free Country, USA#Politics]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:Well, unless you count [[Lack of Visible Arms]]... =3 But yeah. This is essentially covered by the second paragraph on [[Free Country, USA#Politics]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 +
::Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. Bot sure if we should delete this or redirect it.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:00, 17 February 2008

Deletion Discussion

Umm, an article about something that DOESN'T appear? this is a new one... Delete — Defender1031*Talk 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, unless you count Lack of Visible Arms... =3 But yeah. This is essentially covered by the second paragraph on Free Country, USA#Politics. --DorianGray 21:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. Bot sure if we should delete this or redirect it. Loafing 22:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools