HRWiki talk:Personal images

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 19:03, 15 September 2007

Multiple users using an image

To me it seems that images should only be attributed to one person at a time. This was made clear when Joey's image was temporarily attributed to more than one person. I don't see how that could be anyone's image but his, and anyone else who puts it on a page is merely using it. By the same token, several users can get together and loan each other images. (If this becomes a problem then we can figure out what to do then, but it isn't like users aren't already putting gobs of pictures on their pages; they're just using ones that are already in use.) — It's dot com 23:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Fourth category

Should we make a category for images that are so general it's likely a lot of users might want to use them? These would be considered owned by the wiki and thus wouldn't count against anyone's total number of images. I'm talking specifically about things like H*R Wiki logos and whatnot. It would be simple enough for someone to say on an image's talk page: "I think the wiki should claim this one," and if there's a consensus, then it gets put in a different category. What do you think? — It's dot com 23:52, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure. If its so wildly popular, wouldn't it probably be in an article somewhere? — Lapper (talk) 23:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm thinking of things like this (which are shown full-size): I'm not even sure this is a good idea, but the idea popped in my brain and so I thought I'd at least bring it up here. — It's dot com 00:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, now I know we're talking about signature images, too. I'm sure that if a particular signature image became widly used among users then of course the wiki could claim it. How about something like this?

{| align="center" style="width: 80%; background-color: #f1f1de;
   border: 2px solid #996; padding: 5px;"
| [[Image:personal-image.png|50px|Copyright undetermined]]
| <center>''This image has been claimed by HRWiki and is 
   no longer a '''[[HRWiki:Personal images|personal image]].'''''</center>
|}


<includeonly>[[Category:Personal images in use|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>
<noinclude>
[[Category:Image Notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]
</noinclude>

This image has been claimed by HRWiki and is no longer a personal image.

Thoughts? — Lapper (talk) 00:46, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

(Is all that code really necessary to be visible here?) Well, yeah, something like that would work, but we can figure out the wording later. And you didn't really answer my question: I'm asking whether we should have a class of images that would use a template like that. — It's dot com 00:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Article images becoming unused

If a user is using an image from an article, our current standards say that this image doesn't count against his or her total. I'm fine with that. My question concerns what happens when the image from the article is removed or replaced. Does the image become a personal image at this point? My guess is yes, it does. If the user who is using it is already using the maximum allowed personal images, do they have to eliminate one at this point? My guess again is yes, unless we want to say that they are grandfathered on that specific image as long as it stays on their page uninterrupted.
    I really hate having to split hairs like this, but you know it's going to come up sooner or later, and I'd like to have already discussed it a little when that happens. Also, the point of the knowledge base is not so you can make a user page full of images. There are other wikis (including our Fanstuff) and personal websites for that. — It's dot com 00:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Upload

How do i upload a personal image?