Talk:Character Relationships

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(This Page: ec'd)
(This Page: a bit more)
Line 3: Line 3:
:So do I, but right now we lack a clean way to present the list of pages. We use [[User:DeFender1031/Character Relationships|DeFender1031's page]] to keep track of what pages do and don't exist, but while the chart may work alright for us editors, I don't think visiting readers would be inclined to explore a page like that. The category page seems to be the cleanest we have. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 13:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
:So do I, but right now we lack a clean way to present the list of pages. We use [[User:DeFender1031/Character Relationships|DeFender1031's page]] to keep track of what pages do and don't exist, but while the chart may work alright for us editors, I don't think visiting readers would be inclined to explore a page like that. The category page seems to be the cleanest we have. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 13:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
::I see the page. It looks good. Should I use the sandbox example and use it for the page? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 14:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
::I see the page. It looks good. Should I use the sandbox example and use it for the page? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 14:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
-
:::Wow, I was unaware that my page was actually used by anyone other than me... I'm touched. As for what you said, i disagree, i think the chart actually IS the cleanest method. It's clear and makes sense. Not sure it should be in the mainspace at all though. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
+
:::Wow, I was unaware that my page was actually used by anyone other than me... I'm touched. As for what you said, i disagree, i think the chart actually IS the cleanest method. It's clear and makes sense. Not sure it should be in the mainspace at all though. This is for a "See also" at the bottom of the relationship pages I assume? in which case I suggest a see also linking to the cat. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:05, 31 August 2007

This Page

I feel as though we need a page like this. We already have a category, but like at Pseudocharacters. It has a categhory and a page. I think we should avoid the redirect and stick a normal page. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man 13:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

So do I, but right now we lack a clean way to present the list of pages. We use DeFender1031's page to keep track of what pages do and don't exist, but while the chart may work alright for us editors, I don't think visiting readers would be inclined to explore a page like that. The category page seems to be the cleanest we have. — SamSF%20sig.jpgFisher (Come in, Lambert.) 13:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I see the page. It looks good. Should I use the sandbox example and use it for the page? User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man 14:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Wow, I was unaware that my page was actually used by anyone other than me... I'm touched. As for what you said, i disagree, i think the chart actually IS the cleanest method. It's clear and makes sense. Not sure it should be in the mainspace at all though. This is for a "See also" at the bottom of the relationship pages I assume? in which case I suggest a see also linking to the cat. — Defender1031*Talk 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools