User talk:Thesmokingmonkey

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (UM13s: reponse for it's dot com)
(UM13s: reply for The Smoking Monkey)
Line 67: Line 67:
:The "banning" theme struck me as a great comedy vein - I ''do'' know how the wiki was crippled not too long ago by that auto-vandal or whatever that NMSC thing was, and there are certainly enough clowns trolling through here that need to be banned. No argument there. But you have to agree, '''''HRWiki: You Might Not Get Banned!''''' is a great slogan. Well, I'm off to mock the elderly, keep on tranglin' yourself, {{User:Thesmokingmonkey/sig}} 18:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
:The "banning" theme struck me as a great comedy vein - I ''do'' know how the wiki was crippled not too long ago by that auto-vandal or whatever that NMSC thing was, and there are certainly enough clowns trolling through here that need to be banned. No argument there. But you have to agree, '''''HRWiki: You Might Not Get Banned!''''' is a great slogan. Well, I'm off to mock the elderly, keep on tranglin' yourself, {{User:Thesmokingmonkey/sig}} 18:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
::I did notice that quite a bit of the article was dead-on accurate. I thought that kind of thing was frowned upon over there. ;) — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
----
----
<nowiki>*</nowiki><small>What happened to the other five archives, you ask? Curiously, they have been eaten by a grue. Grues do that, you know. </small>
<nowiki>*</nowiki><small>What happened to the other five archives, you ask? Curiously, they have been eaten by a grue. Grues do that, you know. </small>

Revision as of 19:26, 21 February 2006


Contents

MONKEY ARCHIVE #6*

If Seized by the Wikimuse, Write Some Stuff Here: FREE OF CHARGE!

Uncyclopedia

Hi man! You are a member of that wiki, right? Have you seen the article about us? I know it's a parody wiki, but why center around the vandals? I don't have problem about the 30 year olds arguing with childern, which is kinda true. But the part inviting people to troll? Bugh! Can you please fix it? Elcool (talk)(contribs) 16:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

ACH! E.L., hey - I haven't checked this in a while, but I'll take a look. I can't promise anything, but the article is over the line, I see what I can do. THE SMOKING MONKEY 11:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandals Bad, Smoking Monkey Good

Listen up, you puerile applejohns, give it a rest. Things are different there than here - this is a site devoted to chronicling a comedy site, and Uncyclopedia is devoted to mocking everything on this green earth. If you can't take a joke, I'll bet you can't make a joke, either. And, with apologies to Dot com, I'm going to exercise the liberty and freedom given to me by the President here on my own talk page to rewrite the "discussion" as I see fit (for the original idle chat see the original wikicode for this page, and for a definition of parody consult a dictionary).

Seriously and the Thing: A Rainy Afternoon

1 4m 1337 haXXOr OMG!!!!111!ONE11 1 V4nDiLi2'D [1]!11!!!1! Seriously (Talk) 17:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
. JA U PwN n00bs OMGROFL i DO'Ed it T00 n00bs--TheThin 17:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
TeH Unclyip3di4 be uB3R SuXX 4VINGE ME, THE THING! 1 WAS B70CKED! AVInGE ME!!!!Seriously (Talk) 17:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
OMG LOL U R 1337 --TheThin 17:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
14M 1337 Seriously (Talk) 17:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
j00 R 1337!!11!!1 --TheThin 17:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

UM13s

Ha ha! That term is priceless! I may steal it someday (without giving credit). I also like what you did with the conversation above, which, strangely, is much better than the original. I commented out my, er, comments there, because they seemed too serious in light of the revised wording. (For those of you wondering, I told Seriously and The thing to take their private chat somewhere besides a third party's user space, and I expressed my embarrassment that anyone, especially someone from here, would vandalize a wiki and then brag about it.) By the way, Dave, I'm sure you know this but I'll say it anyway: We don't like blocking people here; recently it just seems people are going out of their way to try and get blocked. Keep on tranglin'! — It's dot com 17:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Ahoy, Ben, glad you liked the article and the new acronym. I decided, hey, if anyone had a good idea of the workings of HRWiki and how to lampoon them, it'd be me. Especially since the one that was there was mean. And stupid. Stupid and mean. You guys don't deserve that, so I did my best to fix it.
The "banning" theme struck me as a great comedy vein - I do know how the wiki was crippled not too long ago by that auto-vandal or whatever that NMSC thing was, and there are certainly enough clowns trolling through here that need to be banned. No argument there. But you have to agree, HRWiki: You Might Not Get Banned! is a great slogan. Well, I'm off to mock the elderly, keep on tranglin' yourself, THE SMOKING MONKEY 18:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
I did notice that quite a bit of the article was dead-on accurate. I thought that kind of thing was frowned upon over there. ;) — It's dot com 19:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

*What happened to the other five archives, you ask? Curiously, they have been eaten by a grue. Grues do that, you know.
Personal tools