User talk:Tampo

From Homestar Runner Wiki

edit reply history purge

subject: emails

a> run Tampo's email.exe

---

You have new emails.

Contents 1 TALK TO TAMPO!!!! 2 Just letting you know 3 Just letting you know 4 Bread 5 HTML 6 Stub Template 7 Minor edit??

TALK TO TAMPO!!!!

Leave a message here for me. [[User:Tampo|Tampo]]

Just letting you know

Hi Tampo I was just letting you know that i told JoeyDay what Dot Com did.Just letting you know .--Master Chief 23:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Master Chief, I have replied on Joey's talk page, but I need to tell you that if you know what's good for you, you'll stay out of this. I'm not sure what you were planning to do with that sockpuppet you just made, but it can't have been good. — It's dot com 23:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Just letting you know

Hey Tampo just letting you know that JoeyDay believes Dot Com that we have vandal sockpuppets.just letting you know.--Master Chief 20:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi Tampo JoeyDay believes Dot Com that we have vandal sockpuppets when we didn't make any.JoeyDay said if we keep doing it we will get banned infinite. He even says he has proof.--Master Chief 21:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Whatever. Anyway, I can always go to his talk page to wait for a reply. Tampo (^T/C) 00:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Bread

Tampo, I'm not sure what you found wrong with my edit to Bread, so it would be nice for you to give a reason (and it'd also be nice to not declare "editrevert wars"). My edit put it in correct chronological order and fixed the format. Please do not change it back. Thank you. —FireBird|Talk 13:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

I thought that wasn't added yet. That's why I added it back. Now I see it. Tampo (^T/C) 13:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

You have reverted nearly a dozen edits recently without saying why. Please use the edit summary to actually explain your edits. Note that most of your reversions have themselves been reverted. — It's dot com 22:18, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

HTML

Hey Tampo. Did you know that you cannot validally close a p amidst your font or span tags? Paragraph markup is what's called "block-level" and span/font are "inline-level". Inline can be inside block, but block can't split up inline. Just mentioning it as I've noticed you tweaking your code in your welcome. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  16:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

More info - the code inserts a p when the list begins. So you need to close the font or span tags before the list, and repoen/reclose them for each list item, and then reopen after the list. Then it'll validate. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  16:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Stub Template

Hi, I noticed you again tried to add the plainlinks span to the stub template, despite being reverted by It's dot com last time. Do not attempt to edit the template again. Thanks. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 14:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

There's no reason to add plainlinks in a span. It's already in the div. You'll notice that there's currently no external link icon. — It's dot com 22:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Minor edit??

Tampo, a minor edit is one which doesn't alter the content in any way. Why in the world did you mark your recent removal of a few paregraphs of HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 19 as minor? - Qermaq - (^T/C)  00:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)