User talk:Super Turtle
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Sam the Man (Talk | contribs) (→Don't Quit) |
(my observations) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hey there. I noticed you made some edits and were erased. Sometimes if there a link or picture is there, don't really explain it. So that is all I wanted to say. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} | Hey there. I noticed you made some edits and were erased. Sometimes if there a link or picture is there, don't really explain it. So that is all I wanted to say. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Let me share my observations. I've taken some time and looked at some of your edits to the main namespace (that is, the articles). Each one I've seen merited reverting, I'm afraid. [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Sbemail_169_Deleted_Scene&diff=prev&oldid=452028 This one] explained what was already explained unnecessarily. [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Date_Nite&diff=prev&oldid=450461 Here,] you created a subcategory which is nonstandard, and really shouldn't be created without discussion, per [[HRWiki:Standards|standards]]. [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Interrupted_Conversations&diff=prev&oldid=446158 This one] was never reverted at all. I'm thinking that if you look into the links you were provided when welcomed (see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:TheCoolRobot&diff=prev&oldid=446166 here]) you can really learn how to contribute here and have more of your edits stand the test of time. Remember, even the most experienced editors have edits reverted. The difference is we take it in stride, knowing that whatever we put here is not for us but for others. Hope you stay and keep learning our strange, mysterious ways and contributing. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:58, 3 May 2007
Don't Quit
Hey there. I noticed you made some edits and were erased. Sometimes if there a link or picture is there, don't really explain it. So that is all I wanted to say. 
Sam the Man 
- Let me share my observations. I've taken some time and looked at some of your edits to the main namespace (that is, the articles). Each one I've seen merited reverting, I'm afraid. This one explained what was already explained unnecessarily. Here, you created a subcategory which is nonstandard, and really shouldn't be created without discussion, per standards. This one was never reverted at all. I'm thinking that if you look into the links you were provided when welcomed (see here) you can really learn how to contribute here and have more of your edits stand the test of time. Remember, even the most experienced editors have edits reverted. The difference is we take it in stride, knowing that whatever we put here is not for us but for others. Hope you stay and keep learning our strange, mysterious ways and contributing. - Qermaq - (T/C)
03:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
