User talk:Dacheatbot

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 10:47, 7 November 2006 by Homsarroks (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


You know, you asked about ideas for your User page. I peeked at your contributions and saw that you've made less than 100 edits to the main articles (which is not a bad thing in any way) but you've made over 250 edits to your user page, sig and other stuff. My idea is to keep it simple and don't spend too much time on it, saving time for what we're really here for, which is documenting the H*R cartoons. Just an idea. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 19:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh.... Ok..... (feels shame in the corner) --Dacheatbot · Communicate 19:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
No no no. My intention was never to shame you. Just pointing out that, while there are a lot of users who NEVER make main namespace edits, you're not one of those. Frankly, I think we need more users who can do good main namespace editing and (yep, I'll say it) less of the HRWiki-is-MySpace type users. You're capable of being in either camp, based on what I've seen from you. I'd like you in the "good main namespace editor" camp, personally. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 19:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I know i say this a lot, but I can't find anything to do --Dacheatbot · Communicate 19:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I hear ya. Most of my edits lately have been reverts and helpful talk posts on article talks and occassional user talks. It's slow. Hopefully tomorrow there'll be a new email and there'll be plenty to do. When I was new here, I'd just watch Recent Changes when a new toon came out to see the variety of activities that took place as a result. You might peek at the contributions list of some users you respect and see what they've been up to lately. It might give you some ideas.
Oh, and I'd like to clarify something that my previous post doesn't say well enough. I don't think there's anything wrong with a cool-looking user page (look at mine, for example) and with a small amount of chatter on user talk pages. But it's when a user is doing nothing or little but that, that's when I question why that user is here. You, though, do a lot of main namespace editing and that's why I don't count you among those users.
So don't read what I wrote as "I dislike users with flashy user pages and who talk on user talks" - rather, I question the relevance to this wiki of the actions of users who do nothing but that. I think you know the type of user I'm describing. Well, any chance I get to suggest a user get into more main namespace editing (and "all opinions are welcome" was an open door!) I'm going to use it. Like I said, that's exactly the kind of user I think we need more of. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Very Good timing on TBC's part ;) --Dacheatbot · Communicate 03:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I think you should make your userpage in the format of a hall of fame commemorating men with partially tucked in shirts!--Image:Homsar-in-motion.gifhr.pngΨHomsarΨroksΨImage:kookysig.gifImage:Cheat-shrug-tiny.gif 21:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


Now, If I know this wiki well enough, I would say that there are a lot of gamers out there. If you own a gaming console(s) (or are going to get one from the next generation) list it/them below. Console not yet owned should be put in quotes.

NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Gamecube, PS2, Xbox 360, "Wii" --Dacheatbot · Communicate 21:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

SNES, N64, Gamecube, and the Dustball 680 (with Fiber!)--Image:Homsar-in-motion.gifhr.pngΨHomsarΨroksΨImage:kookysig.gifImage:Cheat-shrug-tiny.gif 10:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools