User talk:BazookaJoe
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Contents |
This is sad...
The Wiki is losing its need for editing, it is so sad. 72.150.230.125 19:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- What is that supposed to mean.--H*bad 19:57, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- Guess there's not much to do when there isn't a significant update.. —BazookaJoe 20:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there's still things to be perfected. As long as H*R keeps producing cartoons, we'll still have work to do. Thus, the wiki will never lose its need for editing. And when there's not a significant edit, just make minor fixes to pages. After all, I know that we don't all have prefect grammar. :P — Seriously (Talk) 20:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- And there's always Sound Effects to add. That one's a perpetual stub. --DorianGray
- Well, there's still things to be perfected. As long as H*R keeps producing cartoons, we'll still have work to do. Thus, the wiki will never lose its need for editing. And when there's not a significant edit, just make minor fixes to pages. After all, I know that we don't all have prefect grammar. :P — Seriously (Talk) 20:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- Guess there's not much to do when there isn't a significant update.. —BazookaJoe 20:02, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think that the sound effects will always be a stub.--H*bad 20:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- As long as things are produced, it will be... There's always a new sound effect to add, or an old one you just suddenly notice from re-watching an old toon. --DorianGray
Sound
Is there a way to upload audio on to here?--H*bad 21:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- I am not acquainted with one. —BazookaJoe 21:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oh ok.--H*bad 21:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mike Chapman
- Thanks for the help. :) Danny Lilithborne 05:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Recent rollback
Actually, the last part of my edit summary didn't mean much. I merely reverted it because of its innapropriate language. — Seriously (Talk) 18:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
IP change
How does an Ip address change if you don't change computers?--H*bad 20:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it's your Internet Service Provider that is changing the IP for whatever reason, probably just by random assignments. Generally, you have no control over what your IP is. —BazookaJoe 05:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, that really scared me for a while.--H*bad 05:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Sysop nom.
Why haven't we had a sysop nomination in a while?--H*bad 20:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- There hasn't been a need for large-scale nominations in the past year. Back in the day, things were a bit different. The need for sysops was great, and there were many qualified users. The admins of the time decided that nominations would be an appropriate format for deciding sysops. It was a good way for the community to find the cream of the crop. Nowadays, the need for new sysops is not as great. The cream of the crop is now easier to spot out of the crowd. That is why the last two rounds of sysop appointments have been decided by the bureaucrats. —BazookaJoe 20:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Is that why. Ok.--H*bad 21:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Another question. Why aren't you a beaucrat? Your a great user.--H*bad 14:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- *blush* Thanks. But other people have done so much more than me. And I'm content where I am; bureaucratship isn't my goal. —BazookaJoe 14:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ok. It just seems to me that your a really great user. Also, since your my favorite sysop of the week, I have to copy you in some way. And do you know something I could copy of yours?--H*bad 14:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then you should copy his good editing style, his strong contributions, his keen eye for problems with the recent changes, and his sharp decision-making skills. (Incidentally, the only extra powers a bureaucrat has is to assign user groups (e.g. make sysops) and rename users. We've pretty much got that covered for a while.) — It's dot com 15:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- And good grammer skills.--H*bad 15:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- You can look through my proudest contributions on my user page for ideas. I'm not saying that writing a transcript is a high honor, though. It is to some, but being able to transcribe something new on the Homestar Runner website is a very rare opporitunity, and I don't try too hard to do so. There are many things that you can do on the site that you don't have to wait for or compete for. DVD transcripts I like writing more, as you can see. However, I thing the thing I enjoy doing most is all-around maintenance of the site. Patrolling recent changes, reverting trolls and vandals (which are much more abundant during the summer), perfecting pages mild OCD style, double-checking transcripts (I often call those last two "fix-ups" in my edit summaries). But everybody has different styles. Find something you are good at doing and like doing, and find ways to get it done. —BazookaJoe 15:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- And good grammer skills.--H*bad 15:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then you should copy his good editing style, his strong contributions, his keen eye for problems with the recent changes, and his sharp decision-making skills. (Incidentally, the only extra powers a bureaucrat has is to assign user groups (e.g. make sysops) and rename users. We've pretty much got that covered for a while.) — It's dot com 15:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ok. It just seems to me that your a really great user. Also, since your my favorite sysop of the week, I have to copy you in some way. And do you know something I could copy of yours?--H*bad 14:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- *blush* Thanks. But other people have done so much more than me. And I'm content where I am; bureaucratship isn't my goal. —BazookaJoe 14:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Another question. Why aren't you a beaucrat? Your a great user.--H*bad 14:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Is that why. Ok.--H*bad 21:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Here is a page I made. Please tell me if you like it. Homestar's one line lessons I know that the name is bad, but anyways.--H*Bad 14:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- It looks like a good start. —BazookaJoe 14:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Is it indanger of being deleted or close to it?--H*Bad 14:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- It could be. Depends on if you can get enough appearances to convince us that it's a running gag. Then, it's up to the community. —BazookaJoe 14:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- I have seen this one that was like just one appearance. Which reminds me to put the stub tag on it.--H*Bad 14:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- It could be. Depends on if you can get enough appearances to convince us that it's a running gag. Then, it's up to the community. —BazookaJoe 14:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Is it indanger of being deleted or close to it?--H*Bad 14:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- It looks like a good start. —BazookaJoe 14:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
"Strong" Vandalism?
Hi Joe. Why did you revert my edit on Strong's talk page, where I criticized his behavior? When I see someone create a user account and immediately start vandalizing user pages, I see a troll, and I thought trolls were universally dealt with as such. Am I wrong in thinking that? — 
KieferSkunk (talk) — 14:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- You should save the debate for my talk page; he doesn't need to see something like that on his talk page. I'm just trying something a little different. Because he says he wants to be blocked, I am not going to, but I want to show him that there are better things to do on this wiki. If it doesn't work out, then, that's that. —BazookaJoe 14:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Eh, personally, I'd just have canned him anyway. Someone who's deliberately vying for that sort of attention doesn't want (or deserve) to be reasoned with. —
KieferSkunk (talk) — 14:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe so, but there's always that chance that trying will affect his character. —BazookaJoe 14:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Eh, personally, I'd just have canned him anyway. Someone who's deliberately vying for that sort of attention doesn't want (or deserve) to be reasoned with. —
