User talk:202.76.162.34

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 03:25, 9 August 2007 by Loafing (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Hey there, 202.76.162.34, please refrain from using expletives in your edit summaries, like what you did here. If you continue, there's a possibility you will have all editing privileges removed for a period of time. Thanks! Bluebry 02:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] this edit

Umm, I'm not quite sure what to make of this. I have since reverted it. I can't believe that someone would sit and write all of that. It looks like some sort of literary scrambling script, although why someone would apply one to a wiki page confuses me. Was this a mistake? Just explain me what you were trying to do when this happened. Any explanation would be much appreciated. — Defender1031*Talk 01:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the Homestar Runner Wiki. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our resource. Take a look at Help:Editing if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Homestar-Winner (talk) 03:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Actually, if you look at this IP's contributions, you'll find that he/she is a repeat offender (in mild proportions) to this Wiki. --TheYellowDart(t/c) 04:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
But he has made several good contributions, so I say we give him another chance. Homestar-Winner (talk) 04:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Well, we should just wait until an admin replies here. It is really none of our business to put up a warning sign when we do not have sysop capabilities... --TheYellowDart(t/c) 05:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Well, I was just thinking that if I want to become a sysop one day, I should start doing what I think sysops would do. And I thought a sysop would put up a block warning. I apologize if it wasn't the right thing to do. Homestar-Winner (talk) 05:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
OK guys, please stop this discussion on an anonny talk page. Anybody can put up a block warning, if it's deserved. This user's history is mixed, and so a block warning might be borderline appropriate. Also, note that no sysop has removed the warning. And I am out. Loafing 05:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summaries and Account

Heylo, it'd be great if you could use descriptive edit summaries so that those who patrol the recent changes know why you made those edits. Especially this edit would have benefitted - people will definitely wonder why you simply deleted a big chunk of the paragraph. On a related note, you might want to create an account. It has many benefits. :-) Loafing 01:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.

Personal tools