Template talk:Dangeresque
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→The Stunt Double: Tis done) |
(→How would) |
||
| (includes 2 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::::Aye, he's not actually a character at all. Ditto for Istanbul. I say stick them in Misc. On a side note, considering the genre, I'm wondering if "Good Guys" and "Bad Guys" would work better than pro- and ant- agonists =D --[[User:Belthazar|Belthazar]] 04:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC) | ::::Aye, he's not actually a character at all. Ditto for Istanbul. I say stick them in Misc. On a side note, considering the genre, I'm wondering if "Good Guys" and "Bad Guys" would work better than pro- and ant- agonists =D --[[User:Belthazar|Belthazar]] 04:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::People seem to favor so...edit'd. {{User:Strongkinghomsarsmith/sig}} 04:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC) | :::::People seem to favor so...edit'd. {{User:Strongkinghomsarsmith/sig}} 04:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Characters == | ||
| + | |||
| + | BRILLIANT! Makes the template a little big, though. {{User:Dr. Savage/sig}} 05:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==How would== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[The Chief]] fit on here? With the new format that lists who plays the characters, how do we categorize him? {{User:Strongkinghomsarsmith/sig}} 00:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 2 December 2008
Contents |
Wait, then...
Defender, what do you mean by "this isn't the right place to put this"? --64.149.213.65 02:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- To use clear, we put "{{clear}}" on pages that need it, not on templates, since it's not always necessary, and not always wanted. Check the page you did that to fix, it looks right now even without it. — Defender1031*Talk 02:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Umm, i don't know how to say this, but based on the edits you've been making and the number of templates that DID have the clear... i umm... i appear to have been mistaken... It DOES make sense for nav templates to have a clear... I feel dumb. — Defender1031*Talk 02:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, no problem. I'll start undo'ing them all. --64.149.213.65 02:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Umm, i don't know how to say this, but based on the edits you've been making and the number of templates that DID have the clear... i umm... i appear to have been mistaken... It DOES make sense for nav templates to have a clear... I feel dumb. — Defender1031*Talk 02:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
The Stunt Double
I'm wondering whether TSD should be an antagonist, or even a character at all (in which case, he should go under Misc.). So...What do you other users think? Strongking
homsarsmith 01:00, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- As i said on the stunt double talk, what makes him an antagonist?
_-Dr. S-_ 02:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- In Dangeresque 1, he played Killingyouguy for a few seconds, in the scene where Homestar/Dangeresque Too was tied to a rope and doing a Street Fighter-style spinning kick.
BBG 02:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- But...he's a stunt double more often used for Strong Bad/Dangeresque. I repeat: Stunt. Double. Strongking
homsarsmith 02:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Aye, he's not actually a character at all. Ditto for Istanbul. I say stick them in Misc. On a side note, considering the genre, I'm wondering if "Good Guys" and "Bad Guys" would work better than pro- and ant- agonists =D --Belthazar 04:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- But...he's a stunt double more often used for Strong Bad/Dangeresque. I repeat: Stunt. Double. Strongking
- In Dangeresque 1, he played Killingyouguy for a few seconds, in the scene where Homestar/Dangeresque Too was tied to a rope and doing a Street Fighter-style spinning kick.
Characters
BRILLIANT! Makes the template a little big, though. 
_-Dr. S-_ 05:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
How would
The Chief fit on here? With the new format that lists who plays the characters, how do we categorize him? Strongkinghomsarsmith 00:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
