Talk:your funeral

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 05:44, 13 March 2007 by Quolnok (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Can I help?

can I help with trying to find some glitches? -The Denzel 01:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

You don't have ask. Do whatever you want to help. —BazookaJoe 01:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

the email is down right now.

This probably means it will soon be updated in a way that will be of interest for the 'glitch/trivia' section.168.156.44.101 02:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

...uh, no. It's not. --TheYellowDart(t/c) 02:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
(if you are getting a 404'd from it, hold down the shift key and hit the reload button) BryanCTC 02:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
It perhaps wasn't gone for long, I reloaded it SEVERAL during a few minutes when it wouldn't seem to appear.24.22.145.14 05:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Homestar lip dot?

When Homestar is reading from the phone book, one of the mouth frames has a black dot on it, and shows up whenever that particular frame is up. 69.105.202.40 (talk • contribs) {{{2}}} (left unsigned)

- Check please. --Addict 2006 03:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Too far?

O_O Too... i dunno. Definitely not for kids. More PG-13 rated.

-Everybody! 70.249.46.80 (talk • contribs) {{{2}}} (left unsigned)

Uh... Why? Because there's corpses? --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 02:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
It's all pretty cartoony, expecially how Strong Bad continues to fail staying dead. Strong Bad waking up with an exposed ribcage creeped me out a little, but I wouldn't say the email went too far. - Joshua 02:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I think they were in danger of going too far, given the rather morbid question, but I have to say they handled it quite nicely. I mean, Homestar reading from the phone book at a eulogy? Genius! Has Matt? (talk) 02:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Got it! -Everybody! 70.249.46.80 (talk • contribs) {{{2}}} (left unsigned)
Getting a bit forumy here. Let's keep this page about the content. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer 02:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

50th Lappy-mail

This is the 50th Lappy e-mail. Sweet. Here's hoping it'll outlive the Compy! --Color Printer 02:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Only if the quality and humor in the Lapp-e-mails can reach that of the Compy era... ::rolls eyes:: EYanyo 04:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Egg - future SB

Are you sure he's a zombie in the egg? When he came out of the jar as a zombie he had black eyes and a visible rib. In the egg it looks like he's just stuck somethng to his head, put on some tattered jeans and is spitting out a mouthful of grape jelly. - Quolnok 03:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree. I think he's still alive there.Shwoo 03:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Which would agree with what he said at the end of the email. How he hoped the zombies would let him be on their side, even though he was alive. Heimstern Läufer 03:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
While I see where you all are coming from, in my opinion, SB acts more like a zombie in the easter egg than in the e-mail. That is, in the e-mail proper, he has complete and full consciousness, while such presumably cannot be said for egg SB. EYanyo 05:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, he acts like a zombie, anyone can spit out jelly while saying "Blarg". - Quolnok

References in future characters?

Do you think Future Pom Pom and Future Strong Sad are references in themselves? Future Pom Pom looks a lot like Duke Nukem... 68.44.220.232 (talk • contribs) {{{2}}} (left unsigned)

By their faces, beards, cigars, and ammo belts, I am willing to wager that it is a reference to the Contra series of video games and the 2 main chracters from the original game in that series. See the picture located here for confirmation purposes.~DanZero 06:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Interesting — I wonder if there's a closer reference though, only because Contra doesn't have anything like zombies in it. Or maybe it's just a general reference to that style of gritty '80s action hero... Trey56 05:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

screaming yellow

Is there any evidence that this is really a reference to the candy, and not say, to the car? Either seems pretty much arbitrary to me. Perhaps the candy is a bit more in "TBC style" as far as references go (so retro). BryanCTC 05:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

But TBC didn't make the reference... --Jay v.2020 (Talk) 05:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
yes, of course, since this is in the body of the email received, it should be assumed that TBC are refering to nothing at all, and it's simply word for word the email they received. At any rate, it feels like speculation to me. Though, there are only 2 or 3 things in the popular lexicon that I can imagine the author of the email intended. BryanCTC 05:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Removed as speculation, we have no idea what the author intended and there is more than one possiblity BryanCTC:

Personal tools