Talk:independent

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Juno)
(Juno)
Line 115: Line 115:
:on the grounds that Juno is (the contributor even admits) not the only thing this could be a reference to, and I thought it was our policy around here not to make statements like "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences." Nonetheless, the item was resurrected a few edits later, and even brought back in its original form a few edits after that, and has now sprouted an additional excuse for inclusion, that the director is the son of a famous director (which doesn't make it any more of a reference to hand-drawn animated intros). However, I am not someone who has time to keep coming back and deleting something just to stand my ground, so let me just register my disagreement here. [[User:LikeAsItself|LikeAsItself]] 02:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
:on the grounds that Juno is (the contributor even admits) not the only thing this could be a reference to, and I thought it was our policy around here not to make statements like "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences." Nonetheless, the item was resurrected a few edits later, and even brought back in its original form a few edits after that, and has now sprouted an additional excuse for inclusion, that the director is the son of a famous director (which doesn't make it any more of a reference to hand-drawn animated intros). However, I am not someone who has time to keep coming back and deleting something just to stand my ground, so let me just register my disagreement here. [[User:LikeAsItself|LikeAsItself]] 02:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
:::It says "such as." That means that it's not saying it's a reference to '''only''' Juno, but just using that particular one as an example. I'm reverting. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
:::It says "such as." That means that it's not saying it's a reference to '''only''' Juno, but just using that particular one as an example. I'm reverting. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
-
::::I didn't add the reference to begin with, but changed it back to Juno with explanation after someone else suggested Shortbus.  I think it's probably an actual reference to Juno, especially with the added director comment.  Regardless, if you look at it grammatically, it isn't of the form "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences," but "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to films such as Juno."  Maybe it could be re-reworded to indicate that PP's film references Juno, which has a hand-drawn ... and a director who's the son of a famous ....[[Special:Contributions/146.122.71.68|146.122.71.68]] 12:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
+
::::I didn't add the reference to begin with, but changed it back to Juno with explanation after someone else suggested Shortbus.  I think it's probably an actual reference to Juno, especially with the added director comment.  Regardless, if you look at it grammatically, it isn't of the form "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences," but "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to films such as Juno."  Maybe it could be re-reworded to indicate that SB references Juno, which has a hand-drawn ... and a director who's the son of a famous ....[[Special:Contributions/146.122.71.68|146.122.71.68]] 12:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
== Nitpicky? ==
== Nitpicky? ==

Revision as of 12:52, 12 August 2009

Contents

New evolution.

I think Strong Sad has a new look in this email. User:MICGAGUH

No, he doesn't. That happened last week. but, for some reason, he switches between his old and new design. the old one shows up when he films the dead plant. then, when he graps the monopoly money, he has his new, more realistic hands. this goes on throughout the rest of the toon.--Crudely Drawn Cupcake 13:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

404'd?

Is anyone else getting 404'd when they try to watch this?--DJmankiewicz 12:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Yep, I definitely am. Even with OpenDNS Servers. ColdReactive 13:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I had to manually change my encoding to UTF-8. There's an accented character in the title bar, and without a proper doctype declaration, some browsers get tripped up. 114.243.125.154 13:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Already Unicode UTF-8 sadly. By the way, How can I change the source of a page I can't see? ColdReactive 13:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
You wanna use a proxy. Something like FastBox.86.138.180.185 14:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
That page you linked seems to be under construction sadly. ColdReactive 14:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
"Fast Box Dot Net: It's Dot Com!" Changed it.
thank you, but the proxy can't seem to show a correct compe email menu. ColdReactive 14:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I can't see either! Maybe it's cause I'm a different time-zone or something. It's pretty early here on the west coast.

I'm also getting 404'd. Furthermore, when I visit homestarrunner.com, there's no mention of a new e-mail on the main page, and the Strong Bad E-mails list is the Corpy Remote with 'imaginary' listed as the most recent. I wonder if this is related to the truncated quote of the day file some of us were getting. Can someone who is successfully loading the site tell us what IP address homestarrunner.com is resolving to? -ReverendTed 14:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm getting a 404 error, and the main page says last updated 8/3. and i live about 3 hours from tbc in the same time zone. The Knights Who Say Ni 14:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
The IP address resolved to 69.59.23.70 over here.
Here's my feedback from ping in bash, if you're interested.
$ ping www.homestarrunner.com
PING homestarrunner.com (69.59.23.70): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 69.59.23.70: icmp_seq=0 ttl=110 time=67.201 ms
64 bytes from 69.59.23.70: icmp_seq=1 ttl=110 time=111.975 ms
64 bytes from 69.59.23.70: icmp_seq=2 ttl=110 time=135.219 ms
64 bytes from 69.59.23.70: icmp_seq=3 ttl=110 time=158.845 ms
^C
--- homestarrunner.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 67.201/118.310/158.845/33.843 ms
Soiled Bargains (talk|ctrb) 14:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
translation please?
You can access the toon at http://69.59.23.70/sbemail203.swf if you can't access the site via http://homestarrunner.com. Wait...that gives me a bad hostname error...never mind. An IP address, in this case, is the other "name" of the website is. We could have used it to access the Flash file of the sbemail, but here it doesn't work. Soiled Bargains (talk|ctrb) 14:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Here is my traceroute:
traceroute to homestarrunner.com (69.59.23.70), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)  1.771 ms * *
 2  10.139.192.1 (10.139.192.1)  7.923 ms * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 64.127.129.13 (64.127.129.13)  14.557 ms  13.837 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * unknown.carohosting.net (69.59.23.70)  43.618 ms
Care of ColdReactive 14:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Strange, I get the same IP address (69.59.23.70). What gives? -ReverendTed 15:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh, hey. It's working for me, now, though I did notice that the sbmails menu doesn't come up at all. -ReverendTed 15:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Working for me now too. ColdReactive 17:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
yeah, i've got it too. even before the wiki came back up. The Knights Who Say Ni 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Error

Strong Sad's finger is screwed up here

So yeah. --Crudely Drawn Cupcake 14:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

We got it now. free 14:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't see it. --Jay v.2024 (Auld lang syne) 16:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

If you do the same thing with your hand, it looks pretty much like SS's hand. There's a crease at the base of the middle finger such that it could look detached, especially in animated form.146.122.71.68 17:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Softer Keypresses

Not sure whether this would be mentioned here, or just on the Compé page, but to me it sounds like the Compé has softer\smoother keypress sounds than previous Compys. -ReverendTed 16:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I noticed that too--Crudely Drawn Cupcake 16:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Choosy users choose single references

"Evil Moms choose Evil Gif" is a play on the sentence "Choosy developers choose GIF", which itself is a play on Jif peanut butter tag line, "Choosy Moms choose Jif"). Choosy developers choose GIF is a rumored sentence that CompuServe Developers, who created the GIF format, said around the office.

Problem is, he says "Moms", not "Developers", which means it's actually closer to the original than the "developers" line (since he pronounces Gif the same way as "Jif"). I say either footnote the "developers" bit or nix it. --Jay v.2024 (Auld lang syne) 16:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Nix it. Both the line from the email and the developers bit are references to the peanut butter, but I doubt the line from the email is intentionally referencing the developers bit. — It's dot com 17:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Looks like someone beat us to the punch. It's already nixed. --Jay v.2024 (Auld lang syne) 17:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Wait, Jay, do you pronounce .gif with a hard g as in "Gifford"? -ReverendTed 23:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
No. But Strong Bad's been known to get confused on the subject. --Jay v.2024 (Auld lang syne) 23:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Short Answer, Long Answer

Should it be noted that that joke was done essentially verbatim in the Spore episode of Zero Punctuation? -128.103.10.135 00:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

I also thought about it, and I think it should stay on the page, but somehow I have a feeling the the long NOOOO have earlier sources. I found this cartoon, but it doesn't have the source year. The Zero Punctuation came out on 17 September 2008, And the long answer joke is the first and most notable one in the video review. It's so exaggerated that it's repeated before the end credits. So, does anybody have a different, more TBC-style source for the joke, or are we going to claim "originality" here? Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it should stay on. It's an old joke, and I don't think that something from 2008 should be sited as the original. I found a post on gamespot from Jan 2 2008 that used it and a Yahoo answer from 2 years ago that used it. I just think that citing that review as the source is ill informed unless TBC say they got it from there.--98.223.125.74 05:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, the first time I heard it was in Jon Stewart's monologue on whether the U.S. government bungled its handling of Hurricane Katrina on the September 6, 2005 edition of The Daily Show. I don't know if the joke is older than that, but ZP's use is not the first, the funniest, or the most widely heard.Tirian 16:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't think this joke was inspired by ZP's. ZP's is obnoxiously long, Strong Bad's is only long enough for it to be funny. Danny Lilithborne 11:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Gnome stomped?

I noticed the first wallpaper (the grass one) here looked like one of the GNOME Wallpapers.

For proof, I have the image here:
File:Gnomewallp.jpg
Any resamplance to this?

Willimm

Do you really? but, a buttdanceNeox ONION BUBS!YOU WILL RESPECT MAH AUTHORI-TAH!!! 00:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Zero Punctuation?

Strongbad's "short answer/long answer" is pretty much exactly the same as a ZP video a while back for Spore:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/zero-punctuation/218-Spore (usually has a good bit of swearing in it, so most likely nsfw)

Think it's worth mentioning as a real-world reference? Or too vague?

See the conversation two sections up. — Defender1031*Talk 06:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Whoops, how did I miss that? Sorry!

Juno

The opening of the "indie film" is very much like the opening to Juno; with the little-known band soundtrack and pencil drawings filling in the scenes etc. I leave the edit in your hands if you deem it worthy. (Previous unsigned comment left by 87.254.80.152)

I removed this Real-World Reference item yesterday:
  • The animated intro in Pom Pom's indie movie is a reference to films which use hand-drawn style opening credit sequences, such as this one from Juno.
on the grounds that Juno is (the contributor even admits) not the only thing this could be a reference to, and I thought it was our policy around here not to make statements like "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences." Nonetheless, the item was resurrected a few edits later, and even brought back in its original form a few edits after that, and has now sprouted an additional excuse for inclusion, that the director is the son of a famous director (which doesn't make it any more of a reference to hand-drawn animated intros). However, I am not someone who has time to keep coming back and deleting something just to stand my ground, so let me just register my disagreement here. LikeAsItself 02:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
It says "such as." That means that it's not saying it's a reference to only Juno, but just using that particular one as an example. I'm reverting. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 02:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I didn't add the reference to begin with, but changed it back to Juno with explanation after someone else suggested Shortbus. I think it's probably an actual reference to Juno, especially with the added director comment. Regardless, if you look at it grammatically, it isn't of the form "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences," but "Hand-drawn animated opening credit sequences are a reference to films such as Juno." Maybe it could be re-reworded to indicate that SB references Juno, which has a hand-drawn ... and a director who's the son of a famous ....146.122.71.68 12:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Nitpicky?

DeFender just reverted the following fact because "it's a cartoon and this is too nitpicky."

*It's odd that Strong Bad didn't notice the desktop before, since he would have had to gone in earlier to set up his e-mail account.

I, however, contend that Remarks are for being nitpicky, and that's why this isn't a goof. Plus, it's something I didn't immediately notice when I was watching the email. Thoughts? --Mario2.PNG Super Martyo boing! 19:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

He's never had to set up an email client before, it always just works from the program strongbad_email.exe which seems to be a client hard-coded to strong bad's email. So that same program is now an icon on the GUI. no problem. — Defender1031*Talk 19:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Or it's possible The Cheat sets it up for him, or Bubs, or whoever has any sort of experience with technology. The point is, though, most likely outside of cartoons Strong Bad would have had to get on the computer to set up his account, and therefore I think it's remarkable. --Mario2.PNG Super Martyo boing! 19:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
As i just said, no he wouldn't, he'd just have had to install that program, which doesn't necessarily require accessing the computer (perhaps it comes standard with the operating system) — Defender1031*Talk 19:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
In a similar vein, it seems strange that Strong Bad would be surprised that the desktop is "actual graphics" when he's obviously familiar with the "24-bit .png with alpha channel." -ReverendTed 20:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Possible Fun Fact?

Which category should this one go under (I was thinking either Explanations or Real-World References)? Or is it completely unnecessary?

  • The car shown in the intro to Pom Pom's indie film is actually a 2007-2008 Nissan Maxima.
    • The car also got 21 City/28 Highway MPG in 2007 and 19 City/25 Highway MPG in 2008.

Homestarmy Commando1

It's interesting, but the second bullet shouldn't go on the page. Put it in "Explanations," I think. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 02:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Talking in theater

Strong Bad is talking in the movie theater (while the projector is showing something). When he talked during an ASCII animation in the movies he identified himself as a hypocrite because he had just complained about other people talking in the theater. Should there be a mention here that he is doing it again? 76.167.93.99 10:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Motion Goof?

When the screen pans across the line of characters at the movie theater the ground doesn't move at the same speed as the characters, resulting in the shapes in the carpet appear to slide under the feet of the characters. Is this considered a goof? The wall should slide behind the characters to show the perspective change, but the ground should stay still beneath their feet.76.167.93.99 10:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools